#FactCheck-Old Video of Thalapathy Vijay Falsely Shared as His Visit to Delhi’s Jantar Mantar Protest

Introduction

The term ‘super spreader’ is used to refer to social media and digital platform accounts that are able to quickly transmit information to a significantly large audience base in a short duration. The analogy references the medical term, where a small group of individuals is able to rapidly amplify the spread of an infection across a huge population. The fact that a few handful accounts are able to impact and influence many is attributed to a number of factors like large follower bases, high engagement rates, content attractiveness or virality and perceived credibility.

Super spreader accounts have become a considerable threat on social media because they are responsible for generating a large amount of low-credibility material online. These individuals or groups may create or disseminate low-credibility content for a number of reasons, running from social media fame to garnering political influence, from intentionally spreading propaganda to seeking financial gains. Given the exponential reach of these accounts, identifying, tracing and categorising such accounts as the sources of misinformation can be tricky. It can be equally difficult to actually recognise the content they spread for the misinformation that it actually is. 

How Do A Few Accounts Spark Widespread Misinformation? 

Recent research suggests that misinformation superspreaders, who consistently distribute low-credibility content, may be the primary cause of the issue of widespread misinformation about different topics. A study[1] by a team of social media analysts at Indiana University has found that a significant portion of tweets spreading misinformation are sent by a small percentage of a given user base. The researchers conducted a review of 2,397,388 tweets posted on Twitter (now X) that were flagged as having low credibility and details on who was sending them. The study found that it does not take a lot of influencers to sway the beliefs and opinions of large numbers. This is attributed to the impact of what they describe as superspreaders. The researchers collected 10 months of data, which added up to 2,397,388 tweets sent by 448,103 users, and then reviewed it, looking for tweets that were flagged as containing low-credibility information. They found that approximately a third of the low-credibility tweets had been posted by people using just 10 accounts, and that just 1,000 accounts were responsible for posting approximately 70% of such tweets.[2]

Case Study

1. How Misinformation ‘Superspreaders’ Seed False Election Theories

During the 2020 U.S. presidential election, a small group of "repeat spreaders" aggressively pushed false election claims across various social media platforms for political gain, and this even led to rallies and radicalisation in the U.S.[3] Superspreaders accounts were responsible for disseminating a disproportionately large amount of misinformation related to the election, influencing public opinion and potentially undermining the electoral process.

In the domestic context, India was ranked highest for the risk of misinformation and disinformation according to experts surveyed for the World Economic Forum’s 2024 Global Risk Report. In today's digital age, misinformation, deep fakes, and AI-generated fakes pose a significant threat to the integrity of elections and democratic processes worldwide. With 64 countries conducting elections in 2024, the dissemination of false information carries grave implications that could influence outcomes and shape long-term socio-political landscapes. During the 2024 Indian elections, we witnessed a notable surge in deepfake videos of political personalities, raising concerns about the influence of misinformation on election outcomes.

2. Role of Superspreaders During Covid-19

Clarity in public health communication is important when any grey areas or gaps in information can be manipulated so quickly. During the COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation related to the virus, vaccines, and public health measures spread rapidly on social media platforms, including Twitter (Now X). Some prominent accounts or popular pages on platforms like Facebook and Twitter(now X) were identified as superspreaders of COVID-19 misinformation, contributing to public confusion and potentially hindering efforts to combat the pandemic.

As per the Center for Countering Digital Hate Inc (US), The "disinformation dozen," a group of 12 prominent anti-vaccine accounts[4], were found to be responsible for a large amount of anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms, highlighting the significant role of superspreaders in influencing public perceptions and behaviours during a health crisis.

There are also incidents where users are unknowingly engaged in spreading misinformation by forwarding information or content which are not always shared by the original source but often just propagated by amplifiers, using other sources, websites, or YouTube videos that help in dissemination. The intermediary sharers amplify these messages on their pages, which is where it takes off. Hence such users do not always have to be the ones creating or deliberately popularising the misinformation, but they are the ones who expose more people to it because of their broad reach. This was observed during the pandemic when a handful of people were able to create a heavy digital impact sharing vaccine/virus-related misinformation. 

3. Role of Superspreaders in Influencing Investments and Finance

Misinformation and rumours in finance may have a considerable influence on stock markets, investor behaviour, and national financial stability. Individuals or accounts with huge followings or influence in the financial niche can operate as superspreaders of erroneous information, potentially leading to market manipulation, panic selling, or incorrect impressions about individual firms or investments.

Superspreaders in the finance domain can cause volatility in markets, affect investor confidence, and even trigger regulatory responses to address the spread of false information that may harm market integrity. In fact, there has been a rise in deepfake videos, and fake endorsements, with multiple social media profiles providing unsanctioned investing advice and directing followers to particular channels. This leads investors into dangerous financial decisions. The issue intensifies when scammers employ deepfake videos of notable personalities to boost their reputation and can actually shape people’s financial decisions. 

Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media

Bots are automated accounts that are designed to execute certain activities, such as liking, sharing, or retweeting material, and they can broaden the reach of misinformation by swiftly spreading false narratives and adding to the virality of a certain piece of content. They can also artificially boost the popularity of disinformation by posting phony likes, shares, and comments, making it look more genuine and trustworthy to unsuspecting users. Bots can exploit social network algorithms by establishing false identities that interact with one another and with real users, increasing the spread of disinformation and pushing it to the top of users' feeds and search results.

Bots can use current topics or hashtags to introduce misinformation into popular conversations, allowing misleading information to acquire traction and reach a broader audience. They can lead to the construction of echo chambers, in which users are exposed to a narrow variety of perspectives and information, exacerbating the spread of disinformation inside restricted online groups. There are incidents reported where bot's were found as the sharers of content from low-credibility sources.

Bots are frequently employed as part of planned misinformation campaigns designed to propagate false information for political, ideological, or commercial gain. Bots, by automating the distribution of misleading information, can make it impossible to trace the misinformation back to its source. Understanding how bots work and their influence on information ecosystems is critical for combatting disinformation and increasing digital literacy among social media users.

CyberPeace Policy Recommendations

1. Recommendations/Advisory for Netizens:

1. Educating oneself: Netizens need to stay informed about current events, reliable fact-checking sources, misinformation counter-strategies, and common misinformation tactics, so that they can verify potentially problematic content before sharing.
2. Recognising the threats and vulnerabilities: It is important for netizens to understand the consequences of spreading or consuming inaccurate information, fake news, or misinformation. Netizens must be cautious of sensationalised content spreading on social media as it might attempt to provoke strong reactions or to mold public opinions. Netizens must consider questioning the credibility of information, verifying its sources, and developing cognitive skills to identify low-credibility content and counter misinformation.
3. Practice caution and skepticism: Netizens are advised to develop a healthy skepticism towards online information, and critically analyse the veracity of all information sources. Before spreading any strong opinions or claims, one must seek supporting evidence,  factual data, and expert opinions, and verify and validate claims with reliable sources or fact-checking entities.
4. Good netiquette on the Internet, thinking before forwarding any information: It is important for netizens to practice good netiquette in the online information landscape. One must exercise caution while sharing any information, especially if the information seems incorrect, unverified or controversial. It's important to critically examine facts and recognise and understand the implications of sharing false, manipulative, misleading or fake information/content. Netizens must also promote critical thinking and encourage their loved ones to think critically, verify information, seek reliable sources and counter misinformation.
5. Adopting and promoting Prebunking and Debunking strategies: Prebunking and debunking are two effective strategies to counter misinformation. Netizens are advised to engage in sharing only accurate information and do fact-checking to debunk any misinformation. They can rely on reputable fact-checking experts/entities who are regularly engaged in producing prebunking and debunking reports and material. Netizens are further advised to familiarise themselves with fact-checking websites, and resources and verify the information.

2. Recommendations for tech/social media platforms 

1. Detect, report and block malicious accounts: Tech/social media platforms must implement strict user authentication mechanisms to verify account holders' identities to minimise the formation of fraudulent or malicious accounts. This is imperative to weed out suspicious social media accounts, misinformation superspreader accounts and bots accounts. Platforms must be capable of analysing public content, especially viral or suspicious content to ascertain whether it is misleading, AI-generated, fake or deliberately misleading. Upon detection, platform operators must block malicious/ superspreader accounts. The same approach must apply to other community guidelines’ violations as well. 
2. Algorithm Improvements: Tech/social media platform operators must develop and deploy advanced algorithm mechanisms to detect suspicious accounts and recognise repetitive posting of misinformation. They can utilise advanced algorithms to identify such patterns and flag any misleading, inaccurate, or fake information.
3. Dedicated Reporting Tools: It is important for the tech/social media platforms to adopt robust policies to take action against social media accounts engaged in malicious activities such as spreading misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda. They must empower users on the platforms to flag/report suspicious accounts, and misleading content or misinformation through user-friendly reporting tools.
4. Holistic Approach: The battle against online mis/disinformation necessitates a thorough examination of the processes through which it spreads. This involves investing in information literacy education, modifying algorithms to provide exposure to varied viewpoints, and working on detecting malevolent bots that spread misleading information. Social media sites can employ similar algorithms internally to eliminate accounts that appear to be bots. All stakeholders must encourage digital literacy efforts that enable consumers to critically analyse information, verify sources, and report suspect content. Implementing prebunking and debunking strategies. These efforts can be further supported by collaboration with relevant entities such as cybersecurity experts, fact-checking entities, researchers, policy analysts and the government to combat the misinformation warfare on the Internet.  

References:

1. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302201 {1}
2. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette {2}
3. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette {3}
4. https://counterhate.com/research/the-disinformation-dozen/ {4}
5. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette
6. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302201
7. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/23/technology/election-misinformation-facebook-twitter.html
8. https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2021/08/06/vaccine-misinformation-and-a-look-inside-the-disinformation-dozen
9. https://healthfeedback.org/misinformation-superspreaders-thriving-on-musk-owned-twitter/
10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139392/
11. https://www.jmir.org/2021/5/e26933/
12. https://www.yahoo.com/news/7-ways-avoid-becoming-misinformation-121939834.html

‍

Executive Summary
‍

A video circulating on social media is being linked to the ongoing tensions in West Asia involving the United States, Israel, and Iran. The clip shows an aircraft crashing into a residential area, with users claiming that a Dubai-bound plane carrying Israeli soldiers crashed near Tel Aviv airport, killing everyone on board. However, an research by the CyberPeace has found the claim to be false. The viral video is AI-generated, and no such incident has taken place in Israel.

‍

Claim

‍

An Instagram user “bebakawaaztv” shared the video on April 7, 2026, claiming that a Dubai aircraft carrying Israeli soldiers crashed near Tel Aviv airport in a residential area, allegedly after being hit by debris from an Iranian hypersonic missile.

• https://www.instagram.com/reels/DW0XP_zEWlh/ 
• https://perma.cc/8A4W-2SK7?type=standard 
  ‍

‍

‍

‍

Fact Check

‍

To verify the claim, we closely examined the viral video. Several visual inconsistencies indicated that it was not real. The aircraft appears to be flying unusually low over a residential area—something that is highly improbable under normal aviation conditions. Its landing gear seems to touch rooftops without causing any visible damage. Additionally, the wings of the aircraft pass through structures like poles without any collision impact, which is physically impossible. These anomalies strongly suggested that the video was artificially created.

We further analyzed the video using the AI detection tool HIVE Moderation, which indicated a 99% probability that the content is AI-generated.

‍

‍

Another analysis using Sightengine also flagged the video as likely AI-generated.

‍

‍

Conclusion

‍

The viral claim is false and misleading. There is no credible evidence or verified report confirming that any Dubai aircraft carrying Israeli soldiers crashed near Tel Aviv airport. No such incident has been reported by any reliable international or local media outlets. The video in question is digitally fabricated using AI technology, and the visual inconsistencies within the clip clearly indicate manipulation. Such content is often designed to exploit ongoing geopolitical tensions and spread misinformation at scale

‍

Introduction

‍

In today's era, where the threat from the digital world is growing rapidly, good developments in the war against cybercrimes cannot be ignored when they do happen. The state, which was notorious for being one of the most notorious criminal states in the country concerning digital crimes, has brought about remarkable changes in the law and order situation in the country in the last few years. According to the most recent data released by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs, Assam recorded only 408 cybercrimes in the year 2024, while the figure for the previous year was 909, which means a decline of over 55% in one year. But what is even more notable about the feat is the fact that, on the other hand, the country as a whole witnessed a rise of nearly 18% in the cybercrimes recorded. 

‍

 Assam's Cybercrime Journey

‍

To understand where Assam is today can only achieve this by understanding how far it has come. In 2021, it was ranked the 5^th highest state or union territory in India in the realm of cybercrime, with a staggering number of 4846 cases. The state kept the worrisome numbers continuing in the year 2022, as it ranked 9^th with 1,733 cases before sliding down to 13^th place in 2023 with 909 cases. However, the steep fall to a minuscule 408 cases in 2024 is an amazing narrative of how a state managed to completely eradicate the cybercrime infrastructure.

This is not a mere coincidence in statistics. This has proved to be a sustained, systematic operation by the law-enforcing agencies. Police sources say the decline is the result of consistent law enforcement action against cybercrime networks and the positive effect of awareness campaigns. Assam recorded 360 arrests under cybercrime-related offences and charge-sheeted 285 in the year 2024.

‍

The National Picture: A Troubling Contrast
‍

While the case of Assam is inspiring, the numbers on a pan-Indian level look bleak. India saw as many as 101,928 cybercrimes registered on its soil in the year 2024; a sharp rise from 2023, when 86,420 incidents had been reported. And it's not just in the number of cases that have seen an alarming rise; the economic implications are equally devastating. As many as 19.18 lakh complaints were lodged on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal in 2024. These complaints were an outcome of the financial losses to the tune of almost Rs 22,811.95 crore, according to a statement by the Home Ministry.

In 2024, the states that stood out at the top were Telangana (27,230), Karnataka (21,993), Uttar Pradesh (11,073), Maharashtra (9,922), and Bihar (6,380), among others. This clearly goes on to prove how the occurrences of cybercrime are not uniform across all states in the country due to various local and state-specific factors like the enforcement provided by state police forces, literacy levels of the general public, and the range of awareness campaigns carried out.

Even within Assam, the trend is not uniform, as almost every other Northeastern state has recorded a rise in cybercrimes this year, the figures being Arunachal Pradesh 24 to 78, Mizoram 31 to 50, Meghalaya 64 to 97, and Nagaland 2 to 14. It is only Tripura that saw a dip in reported cybercrimes, from 36 to 33. Considering these statistics, it becomes even more crucial to study and emulate Assam's success.
‍

The Drivers and Disrupters of Cybercrime
‍

It is in understanding how cybercrimes in Assam are committed that one might derive how these should be combatted. Of the 408 cases registered so far in 2024, 253 were registered for transmitting, or publishing, electronically, any obscene or sexually explicit material, and 115 cases were under computer-related offences. As for motive, they vary widely; 121 cases were registered out of revenge, 55 for fraud, 43 for extortion, and 42 for sexual exploitation. Sadly, out of 408 crimes reported so far in 2024, 196 victims are women, and 20 are children; in essence, the real impact is on society's most vulnerable.

This is a useful categorisation for the policymakers. It would not be beneficial if it were an all-encompassing strategy against cybercrimes when the motives and mechanisms behind them differ so widely. Customised campaigns educating women on cyberbullying, educating children on online security, and cautioning the public against online fraudulent schemes would be much more effective than general advice.

 On the national front, significant investments have been made by the central government for developing cybercrime-fighting infrastructure. Since the I4C was established in 2018, the launch of NCRP in 2019 provides a reporting and coordination framework against cybercrimes, and it is reported that over 5,489 crore have been saved by freezing illegal transactions, stemming from over 17.88 lakh complaints, through these platforms. Over 9.42 lakh SIM cards and 263,248 International Mobile Equipment Identities (IMEI) numbers have been blocked due to involvement in cybercrime.
‍

The Role of Awareness and Enforcement
‍

The biggest, and perhaps most transferable, lesson learned from Assam is the importance of both enforcement and awareness. Alone, neither proves useful: an enforcement operation without public knowledge leaves the public at risk for the next offence, while a purely informational approach gives criminals the license to proceed. Assam seems to have a more pragmatic approach; at least the statistics support this notion.

As the most persistent weakness, cyber hygiene is still a critical issue for India's cybersecurity. The core problem is the limited public knowledge on the importance of safer online practices, and it has been one of the primary hurdles to reducing crimes online; in instances where crimes were committed and reported, insufficient processes and infrastructure remained challenges in their investigation. Therefore, institutional investment in resources such as local police cyber cells and national coordinating agencies is an integral component to overcoming these challenges.z

‍

Conclusion
‍

By decreasing the rate of cybercrime in Assam by 55%, the successful combination of vigorous prosecution, constant pressure to uphold the law, and thorough public awareness campaigns has demonstrated a viable solution to ever-increasing online threats throughout India. Assam presents an attainable blueprint to diminish cybercrime, although the criminals of this evolving landscape cannot be constrained by individual state borders. To successfully achieve an e-economy that thrives on security and trust, India must adapt and expand the same law enforcement and awareness campaign strategies.

‍

References
‍

1. https://assamtribune.com/assam/assam-records-over-55-decline-in-cyber-crime-cases-in-2024-mha-1611895
   
   
2. https://ddnews.gov.in/en/cybercrime-complaints-cross-19-lakh-in-2024-97-drop-in-spoofed-calls-post-new-measures/
   
   
3. https://www.medianama.com/2025/08/223-india-cybercrime-500-percent-increase-2021-2024/
   
   
4. https://statista.com/topics/5054/cyber-crime-in-india‍
5. https://i4c.mha.gov.in