#FactCheck-India Passport Ranking Claim Comparing 2014 and 2026 Rankings Is Misleading

Executive Summary

‍
Several social media users shared an India Today news clipping showing an exclusive interaction between senior journalist Rajdeep Sardesai and Bangladeshi journalist Mahfuz Anam. In the purported conversation, Anam was heard claiming that India’s intelligence agency RAW was trying to prevent Bangladesh from joining the Mecca Pact. He was also allegedly heard saying that New Delhi was promoting an alternative defence pact with Bangladesh involving a Middle Eastern country and Israel. However, the CyberPeace Research Wing found that the viral video had been digitally manipulated using AI-generated audio. The original video, uploaded by India Today, showed Anam in conversation with Sardesai in 2024, discussing Bangladesh’s July uprising and the developments that followed.

‍

Claim

‍

A Facebook page, ‘MatriX MojtabA’, shared an India Today news clipping on August 12 showing senior journalist Rajdeep Sardesai interviewing Bangladeshi journalist Mahfuz Anam. In the purported conversation, Anam was heard saying that RAW was trying to prevent Bangladesh from joining the Mecca Pact. He was also allegedly heard claiming that New Delhi was promoting an alternative defence pact with Bangladesh involving a Middle Eastern country and Israel.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1804199927691664/ 

https://archive.ph/lKGJg 

‍

‍

Fact Check

‍

Based on the clue that the viral clip was taken from an exclusive conversation between Mahfuz Anam and India Today, the Desk conducted a customised keyword search on Google. The search led to an extended version of the same interaction uploaded on India Today’s official YouTube channel. The Desk identified the original footage by comparing the background setting and the clothes worn by both Sardesai and Anam, which appeared identical in the viral and original clips. However, an analysis of the original video established that it was an old recording from August 2024. The video showed Anam and Sardesai discussing Bangladesh’s July 2024 uprising and the developments that followed. The Desk analysed the complete 14-minute-and-three-second video and found that Anam did not mention RAW or the Mecca Pact anywhere in the interaction. The Mecca Pact was signed by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey on August 7, 2026. This established that the statement attributed to Anam in the viral video was not part of the original conversation and had been digitally manipulated. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEoyTkOZ8xE 

‍

‍

Further, after finding indications that the audio in the viral clip may have been AI-generated, the Desk extracted the audio from the video and analysed it using Resemble AI, an AI audio detection tool. The analysis indicated that the audio was AI-generated and did not contain Mahfuz Anam’s original statement.

‍

‍

Conclusion

‍

The viral video showing Bangladeshi journalist Mahfuz Anam purportedly claiming that India’s RAW was trying to prevent Bangladesh from joining the Mecca Pact is digitally manipulated. The audio in the viral clip was replaced with AI-generated audio to attribute a false statement to Anam. The original India Today video, recorded in 2024, shows Anam speaking with Rajdeep Sardesai about Bangladesh’s July uprising and the developments that followed. He does not make any remarks about RAW, the Mecca Pact or an alternative defence pact involving India, a Middle Eastern country and Israel.

‍

Introduction

The Chairman of Vardhman Group, Mr SP Oswal, an India-based textile manufacturer, fell victim to a cyber fraud scheme that cost him ₹7 crore. The scam unfolded on August 28 and 29, conning Mr Oswal into transferring Rs 7 crore into multiple bank accounts. As per the recent reports, the Police have managed to freeze these accounts and recover over Rs 5 crore as of now. The fraudsters convinced Mr SP Oswal that he was a suspect in a money laundering investigation and held on a “Digital Arrest”. These are sophisticated cyber frauds where cyber-criminals impersonate law enforcement officials or other authorities and target innocent individuals with manipulative tactics. The scam targets are often contacted out of the blue, on Instant messaging apps like WhatsApp and informed that their bank accounts, digital identities, or other online assets have been compromised. Criminals play into the victims' fear by threatening them with imminent arrest, legal consequences, or public humiliation if they don't cooperate with a series of urgent demands.

Posing as Officials, Fraudsters Orchestrate ₹7 Crore Scam

The investigation revealed that the fraudsters posed as members of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). They had contacted Mr Oswal and claimed that his Aadhaar had been misused in a case involving fake passports and financial fraud. The imposter conducted a video call in a police uniform using a background with the CBI logo. The fraud escalated further, Mr Oswal got a fake "arrest warrant" on  WhatsApp allegedly authorised by the Supreme Court. Fraudsters convinced Mr Oswal to transfer ₹7 crores to facilitate bail proceedings, claiming he was under "digital arrest". The meticulously planned scam involved fake documents, a virtual courtroom, and relentless intimidation tactics leaving Mr Oswal effectively under "digital arrest" for two days. While the police have successfully recovered over Rs 5 crore so far, this case highlights the alarming threat of digital impersonation of law enforcement authorities.

Legal Outlook on the Validity of Digital Arrests

In India, the main laws governing cyber crimes are the Information Technology Act, of 2000 and the rules made under therein, and the newly enacted Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Recently enacted new criminal laws do not provide for any provision for law enforcement agencies conducting a digital arrest.  The law only provides for service of the summons and the proceedings in an electronic mode. Hence, there are no provisions for conducting 'digital arrests' as per the laws of the country. 

Further, It should be noted that the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), under the Ministry of Home Affairs, coordinates the activities related to combating cybercrime in the country. MHA works closely with other ministries to counter these frauds. The I4C also provides technical support to the police authorities of states/UTs for the identification and investigation of these cases. 

Best Practices to Avoid Digital Arrest Scams 

• To protect yourself from scams, it is crucial to verify the identity of individuals claiming to be law enforcement or government officials and use official contact channels to confirm their credentials. 
• Be cautious of pressure tactics used by fraudsters, especially demands for quick payment over unverified communication platforms like WhatsApp. 
• Cross-check official documents with legal advisors or relevant authorities. 
• Never share sensitive personal information, such as your Aadhaar number, over phone calls, emails, or messages without verifying the request's authenticity. 
• Avoid untraceable payments, such as cryptocurrency or prepaid cards, without validating the transaction's legitimacy, especially under duress. 
• Stay informed on scam techniques, particularly those involving impersonation and digital threats. 
• Enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) for sensitive online accounts to prevent misuse. 
• Consult advice from legal professionals if you receive threatening communication involving digital arrest or legal actions and do not take any action on the asks of persons posing as legitimate authorities. 
• In case of any cybercrime, you can file a complaint at cybercrime.gov.in or helpline number 1930. You can also seek assistance from the CyberPeace helpline at +91 9570000066.

Conclusion

The digital arrest of Vardhman Group's CEO underscores the increasing sophistication of cyber fraud schemes, which exploit fear and urgency, leading to severe financial and reputational harm. No one is immune from cybercrime, vigilance is essential at all leadership levels. While laws like the IT Act and initiatives taken by the I4C help combat cybercrime, rapidly evolving threats demand proactive safety measures. Beyond the possibility of financial loss, incidents like this jeopardise brand reputation, investor confidence, and operational stability. Be cautious of such threats and exercise due care and caution while navigating the digital landscape. Be aware of such kinds of scams and the manipulative tactics used by fraudsters to avoid them. By staying vigilant and aware we can avoid the growing scam of digital arrests. 

References

• https://www.business-standard.com/companies/news/digital-arrest-and-rs-7-crore-heist-how-vardhman-group-head-was-tricked-124100100832_1.html
• https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/vardhman-group-chairman-sp-oswal-duped-of-rs-7-crore-fraudsters-posed-as-cbi-101727666912738.html 
• https://www.msspalert.com/native/digital-arrests-the-new-frontier-of-cybercrime

‍

Introduction

‍

By the morning of May 19, 2026, many Indians woke up to see a worrying message being circulated on WhatsApp and X (formerly Twitter) stating that the government proposed to appropriate all gold stored in the temples, convert it to cash by some new scheme, and further, regard temple towers, doors, etc., gilded with gold as the "Strategic Gold Reserves of India." The panic spread immediately; religious communities were enraged, and online arguments broke out. By afternoon, the rumour was out of control. The catch was that this whole thing was false.

‍

The Rise of Misinformation: An Old Problem with a New Engine

‍

Misinformation is an ancient phenomenon. Folk scholars have observed for centuries that fabrications, rumours, and hoaxes move through the same channels and follow the same patterns as reliable news, deriving their credibility from repetition rather than proof and relying on social networks for believability.

A seminal 2017 study published in the Journal of Economic Perspectives by Allcott and Gentzkow discovered that fake news articles were far more widely shared than the most popular legitimate news articles in the run-up to the 2016 United States presidential election. The study additionally discovered that nearly 62% of all American adults get at least a fraction of their news through social media, a reality the researchers posited would allow fake news to spread wide and far through unvetted channels. 

India is an even more extreme case; on a platform such as WhatsApp, where researcher Kiran Garimella, working for MIT, estimates that 50 billion messages are transmitted every single day in India alone, misinformation is less something that spreads and more something that simply exists.

‍

The Science of Viral Misinformation

‍

The temple gold rumour took a course typical of conspiracy theories. A dramatic, provocative rumour that simultaneously appealed to religious, state, and financial safety was received by an audience already conditioned to mistrust its leaders. In Science, 2018, MIT researchers Vosoughi, Roy, and Aral mapped the very mechanism at scale: it revealed false information to propagate about six times more than true information, reaching about three times as many people. The study further concluded that falsehoods were 70% more likely to be shared than true stories and that the 'engine' of false information spread was not bots and algorithms but humans. The simple reason was that humans prefer something that is novel, surprising, and alarming. 

Pariser further elaborated this process within his book Filter Bubble; as algorithms mainly show users what conforms with their existing beliefs, people are put in individual echo chambers, and their tendency to share emotional or falsified content results in corrections often failing to keep up.

‍

The Importance of Fact-Checking and Official Sources

‍

The government reacted to this with a swift and concise response, and an official statement released by the Ministry of Finance on 19 May 2026 cautioned citizens that all legal government policies are declared only through official press releases, government websites, and appropriate agencies and not via social media forwards.

India has a dedicated institutional resource for exactly this purpose. The PIB Fact Check Unit (FCU), established in November 2019 under the Press Information Bureau, has now published over 2,900 fact-checks covering false claims about government policies, schemes, deepfakes, AI-generated content, fabricated notifications, and fraudulent websites. Citizens can submit suspicious content directly to the FCU via WhatsApp (+91 8799711259) or through factcheck.pib.gov.in: The service is free, confidential, and designed to be accessible.

‍

The Risks of Sharing Unverified Information

‍

Beyond confusion and unnecessary anxiety, the spread of unverified information carries concrete risks. Allcott and Gentzkow's research found that individuals who consumed more ideologically homogeneous information were substantially more likely to believe false headlines, a pattern that holds regardless of education or political affiliation. 

In India, where WhatsApp research has documented that approximately 13% of images shared in politically active groups constitute known misinformation, the consequences have at times extended well beyond digital confusion.

‍

Advisory for Citizens: Verify, Inoculate, and Share Responsibly

‍

Becoming responsible digital citizens is more than just exercising passive vigilance. An important concept every digital citizen ought to know was formulated by John Cook, Stephan Lewandowsky, and Ullrich Ecker in a 2017 PLOS ONE paper: it is called "prebunking."

Debunking seeks to counter a falsehood once it is believed, while prebunking builds resilience in advance of the exposure, similar to how a vaccine inoculates the body to protect against a disease. Prebunking is implemented through an inoculation technique wherein individuals are warned about the presence of likely future misinformation, about the subject and the typical manipulative tactics that the misinformation may use. Exposure, even in an attenuated form, arms individuals with the wherewithal to recognise and disregard the actual misinformation once it appears. What this means in practice is that informed, aware citizens, capable of analysing how misinformation is crafted, are unlikely to fall for a new rumour of this nature.

‍

What should be kept in mind?

‍

• Wait before sharing: A prompt sense of fear, anger, or desire to share a post is not a call to immediate dissemination but an exercise in caution.
• Prebunk yourself and others: Be mindful of subjects that persistently generate falsehoods like government schemes, religious matters, economic policy, and national security.
• Refer to official sources only: The authenticity of claims related to any government scheme can be cross-checked on PIB.gov.in, relevant ministries, or the PIB Fact Check WhatsApp number, 8799711259.
• Identify filter bubbles: Repeated confirmation of your own beliefs and concerns indicates an algorithmic bubble.
• Do not amplify ambiguity: Circulating information merely as a matter of cautious verification has damaging repercussions.
• Rectify what has been shared: Issue the correction to the same recipients as the false information.

‍

Conclusion

‍

The swift clarifications issued by the government in May 2026 and fact-check systems by PIB have helped contain the panic, but the role of the government cannot be seen as the sole bulwark against misinformation. An informed citizenry, digitally and information literate to such an extent that they know how misinformation is created and circulated, is our strongest defence against fake news. It is not only the ability to fact-check but also to detect manipulative attempts before misinformation goes viral. Check before you share. Stop before you panic. When in doubt, check the PIB Fact Check.

References

‍

[1]https://thefederal.com/category/news/centre-rejects-rumours-on-temple-gold-monetisation-scheme-243686

[2]https://aninews.in/news/business/govt-dismisses-reports-on-temple-gold-monetisation-says-claims-are-false-and-baseless20260519103120/

[3] https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2247720

[4] Allcott, Hunt and Matthew Gentzkow. (2017). "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election." Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–23

[5] Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. (2018). "The Spread of True and False News Online." Science 359(6380): 1146–1151

[6] Cook, John, Stephan Lewandowsky, and Ullrich K. H. Ecker. (2017). "Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence." PLOS ONE 12(5): e0175799. 

[7] Garimella, Kiran and Dean Eckles. (2020/2023). "Images and Misinformation in Political Groups: Evidence from WhatsApp in India.

[8] Christakis, Nicholas A. and James H. Fowler. (2011). Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. 

[9] Pariser, Eli. (2011/2012). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You.

‍