#FactCheck -Viral Claim of Alcohol Ban in West Bengal by Amit Shah Is Fake, No Such Announcement Made
Executive Summary
A graphic featuring Union Home Minister Amit Shah is being widely shared on social media, claiming that he has announced a complete ban on alcohol in West Bengal from September 30. The post further suggests that the state will move towards becoming a dry state. Notably, this claim surfaced soon after the BJP’s victory in the West Bengal Assembly elections. CyberPeace Research Wing research has found the viral claim to be false. Our research confirms that Home Minister Amit Shah has not made any such announcement.
Claim:
On Instagram, a user shared a viral graphic on May 8, 2026, alleging that Amit Shah announced a complete ban on alcohol in West Bengal starting September 30. The post link and archived version are provided below:
- https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYDy13zINV5/
- https://archive.ph/mYpZS
Fact Check
To verify the claim, we conducted a keyword-based search on Google. However, we did not find any credible media reports supporting the viral claim. Since the graphic carried the logo of India Today, we also checked the official website, YouTube channel, and social media handles of India Today. However, no matching report or graphic was found.
In the final step, we reviewed the official X account of the Ministry of Home Affairs. Even there, no statement or report confirming the viral claim was found. The relevant link is provided below:
- https://x.com/HMOIndia
Conclusion:
Our research confirms that Home Minister Amit Shah has made no such announcement regarding a complete alcohol ban in West Bengal.
Related Blogs
Executive Summary
A video showing police personnel dancing on the streets along with civilians is going viral on social media. The clip is being shared with the claim that policemen in West Bengal were celebrating the defeat of Mamata Banerjee and the victory of the BJP.
Research by CyberPeace Research Wing found that the claim is misleading. The viral video is old and unrelated to the West Bengal elections.
Claim
An X user shared the video on April 26, 2026, alleging that police personnel were celebrating BJP’s victory. The post questioned those raising concerns over EVMs, suggesting that even police were openly rejoicing over the election outcome.
- https://x.com/Minakshishriyan/status/2051490074957930510
- https://archive.is/d81OT
Fact Check
To verify the claim, we extracted keyframes from the viral video and conducted a reverse image search. This led us to a Reddit post dated September 13, 2022, where the same video was shared. The post described it as footage from Ganesh Visarjan celebrations in India, and several users in the comments identified the location as Maharashtra.
Further research led us to a YouTube channel “Yash Arate Vlogs,” which uploaded the same video on September 10, 2022. The description stated that the clip was recorded during Ganpati immersion celebrations in Kolhapur.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0_w5t-4rmTY
We also found media reports from September 2022 indicating that during Ganesh Visarjan in Kolhapur, loud music and festive atmosphere led even on-duty police personnel to briefly join the celebrations.
Conclusion
Our research confirms that the viral video does not show any post-election celebration in West Bengal. It is an old clip from Maharashtra, recorded during Ganesh Visarjan festivities, and is being falsely shared with a misleading political claim.
On June 5th, the world comes together to reflect on how the way we live impacts the environment. We discuss conserving water, cutting back on plastic, and planting trees, but how often do we think about the environmental impact of our digital lives?
The internet is ubiquitous but invisible in a world that is becoming more interconnected by the day. It drives our communications, meetings, and recollections. However, there is a price for this digital convenience: carbon emissions.
A Digital Carbon Footprint: What Is It?
Electricity is necessary for every video we stream, email we send, and file we store on the cloud. But almost 60% of the electricity produced today is generated from burning fossil fuels. The digital world uses an incredible amount of energy, from the energy-hungry data centres that house our information to the networks that send it. Thus, the greenhouse gas emissions produced by our use of digital tools and services are referred to as our "digital carbon footprint."
To put it in perspective:
- Up to 150–200 grams of CO₂ can be produced by streaming an hour-long HD video on your phone.
- A typical email sent can release about 4 grams of CO₂, and more if it contains attachments.
- Comparable to the airline industry, the internet as a whole accounts for 1.5% to 4% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Why It Matters
Ironically, despite the fact that digital life frequently feels "clean" and weightless, it is backed by enormous, power-hungry infrastructures. Additionally, our online activity is growing at a rapid pace as digital penetration increases. Plus, with the advent of AI and big data, the demand for energy is only going to rise. The harms of air, water, and soil degradation, and biodiversity loss are already upon us. It's high time we reconsider how we use technology on World Environment Day.
What Can You Do?
The good news is that even minor adjustments to our online conduct can have an impact.
🗑️ Clear out your digital clutter by getting rid of unnecessary emails, apps, and files.
📥 Unsubscribe from mailing lists that you no longer use.
📉 When HD is not required, stream videos with lower quality.
⚡ Make use of energy-saving gadgets and disconnect them when not in use.
🌐 Make the move to renewable energy-powered, environmentally friendly cloud providers.
🗳️ Support informed policy by engaging with your elected representatives and advocating for greener tech policies. Knowing your digital rights and responsibilities can help shape smarter policies and a healthier planet.
We at the CyberPeace Foundation think that cyberspace needs to be sustainable. An eco-friendly digital world is also a safer one, where all communities can thrive in harmony. We must promote digital responsibility, including its environmental component, as we work towards digital equity and resilience.
On this World Environment Day, let's go one step further and work towards a greener internet as well as a greener planet.
Introduction
Digital arrest scams operate by fraudsters convincing individuals that they are under official scrutiny, often through fabricated notices, video calls, and staged procedures. The harm is not just technical, it is psychological. It works because it feels real.
It is in this context that the Central Bureau of Investigation has introduced ABHAY, an AI based chatbot intended to help individuals verify whether a notice issued in the name of the agency is genuine or not. At one level, this is a simple verification tool. But on closer inspection, it reflects a deeper shift in how cyber threats are being understood and dealt with.
Understanding ABHAY as a Public Interface
ABHAY is designed as a citizen facing mechanism. A person who receives a suspicious communication can use the tool to check its authenticity. This becomes particularly relevant in situations where individuals are pressured into immediate compliance.
What stands out here is the timing. Traditional responses to cybercrime begin after harm has occurred. Complaints are filed, investigations begin, and then some form of remedy follows. ABHAY, however, operates before that stage. It intervenes at the point where a person is still deciding whether to believe what they have received.
“The AI-powered notice verification chatbot, ABHAY, will allow the public to verify the genuineness of a notice purportedly issued by the CBI. In the context of digital arrest frauds, this provides a much required tool for the citizens,” a CBI spokesperson said.
While this may seem like a small shift, but it changes the logic of response. It introduces verification as a first step, rather than enforcement as a later one. Verification tools aim to interrupt that process at a preventive stage. At the same time, their effectiveness depends on awareness along with the precision and functionality of the ABHAY AI. A tool cannot assist if it is not known or trusted. This places some responsibility on institutions to ensure that such initiatives are communicated clearly and remain accessible.
Digital Arrest Scams and the Problem of Legitimacy
Digital arrest scams depend on imitation and make-believe; all tied up with instilling fear through social engineering. Fraudsters replicate the form and language of legal authority. They even use official looking documents, adopt institutional identities, and often create a controlled environment where the victim feels watched and isolated.
The law usually assumes that a reasonable person can distinguish between genuine and fake communication. But in these cases, that assumption begins to weaken. The more convincing the imitation, the harder it becomes to question it.
ABHAY attempts to address this very gap. It does not investigate or punish, it simply verifies. In doing so, it restores a basic distinction that has become blurred. The distinction between lawful authority and its digital imitation.
Legal Context and Emerging Questions
From a legal perspective, this development sits slightly outside conventional frameworks. Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, offences such as cheating by personation and identity misuse are recognized, but the emphasis is on post facto liability. Similarly, consumer protection law addresses misleading conduct after it has affected consumers.
ABHAY operates at an earlier stage. It functions in what may be called a pre liability space.
This raises certain questions, even if they are not immediately visible. When a state agency provides an AI based verification tool, what is the nature of reliance that can be placed on it. If an individual acts based on its output, does that create any expectation of accuracy or responsibility. These are not yet settled issues, but they are likely to become relevant as such tools become more common.
Conclusion
ABHAY reflects a subtle but important shift in approach. By allowing individuals to verify authenticity at the moment of interaction, it introduces a form of prevention and protection that is immediate and practical. At the same time, it opens up questions around reliability, accountability, and long-term integration of such tools into legal frameworks. These questions will need attention as similar technologies are adopted more widely.
For now, ABHAY represents an early attempt to respond to a changing problem. One where trust itself has become a site of vulnerability.
