#FactCheck- AI-Generated Video of Alleged Iranian Attack on US Helicopter Goes Viral with False Claims
Executive Summary
A video is being widely shared on social media showing armed personnel attacking a helicopter. The video is being circulated with the claim that Iranian soldiers shot down a US military helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz amid rising tensions between the United States and Iran. CyberPeace Research Wing research found the claim to be false. The viral video is AI-generated and is being shared with misleading context.
Claim:
An X (formerly Twitter) user shared the video on June 10, 2026, with the caption: “This is great cinema. Breaking News: Iran used a $150 weapon to bring down a $1 billion US military aircraft. For the first time, America has met its real enemy.”
Post link and archive link can be seen below:
https://x.com/TheIncNews/status/2064758088012607544?s=20
https://archive.ph/LUDUz
Fact-Check
To verify the claim, we conducted a keyword search on Google. However, no credible media reports were found supporting this claim.
On closely examining the video, we suspected it to be AI-generated. We then analyzed it using the AI detection tool HIVE MODERATION. The results indicated that the video is 98% likely to be AI-generated.
In the next step, we further analyzed the video using another AI detection tool, SIGHTENGINE. The results showed a 99% probability of the video being AI-generated.
Conclusion:
Our research confirms that the viral video is AI-generated and does not depict any real-world incident. The content is being circulated with a misleading and false narrative, falsely linking it to ongoing geopolitical tensions, despite there being no credible evidence or verified reports supporting such a claim.
Related Blogs
Executive Summary: A video circulating on social media claims that retired Lieutenant General P.R. Shankar questioned the capability of newly appointed Army Chief Lt Gen Dhiraj Seth, suggesting he may not be able to effectively counter Pakistan or China. The clip further alleges that the appointment involved political influence and favoritism. CyberPeace Research Wing research found the claim to be false and misleading. The original video contains no such remarks regarding the new Army Chief or his appointment.
Claim: An X user shared the viral video on June 16, 2026, alleging that Lt Gen P.R. Shankar raised concerns over the appointment of the new Army Chief and questioned his competence in handling threats from Pakistan and China. https://x.com/indiain24hr/status/2066916021982908502 , https://archive.ph/vAnjo
Fact Check: A Google search using relevant keywords did not yield any credible media reports supporting the claim, raising initial doubts about its authenticity. A reverse image search of keyframes from the viral video led to a YouTube livestream uploaded on June 13, 2026. The original video showed Lt Gen P.R. Shankar discussing modern military concepts such as drone warfare, rocket systems, artillery and missile warfare (DRaM Warfare), with no reference to Lt Gen Dhiraj Seth or his appointment.
https://www.youtube.com/live/60JMMlHRmjA
Further verification revealed that Lt Gen P.R. Shankar himself has labelled the circulating clip as fake on his official X account and has stated that a formal complaint has been filed against such manipulated content.
https://x.com/palepurshankar/status/2066826145707024778
Additionally, AI detection analysis using Hive Moderation indicated that the audio in the viral video has a 99% probability of being AI-generated.
Conclusion: The research confirms that the viral video is an AI-generated deepfake. The original video does not contain any remarks about Lt Gen Dhiraj Seth or his appointment. The content has been digitally manipulated and is being circulated with a misleading narrative.
Executive Summary:
A video is circulating on social media claiming to be footage of the aftermath of Iran's missile strikes on Israel. The video shows destruction, damaged infrastructure, and panic among civilian casualties. After our own digital verification, visual inspection, and frame-by-frame inspection, we have determined that the video is fake. The video is just AI-generated clips and not related to any incident.
Claim:
The viral video claims that a recent military strike by Iran resulted in the destruction of parts of Israel, following an initial missile attack launched by Iran. The footage appears current and depicts significant destruction of buildings and widespread chaos in the streets.
FACT CHECK:
We conducted our research on the viral video to determine if it was AI-generated. During the research we broke the video into individual still frames, and upon closely examining the frames, several of the visuals he showed us had odd-shaped visual features, abnormal body proportions, and flickering movements that don't occur in real footage. We took several still frames and checked them in image search sites to see if they had appeared before. The search results revealed that several clips in the video had appeared previously, in separate and unrelated circumstances, which indicates that they are neither recent nor original.
While examining the Instagram profile, we noticed that the account frequently shares visually dramatic AI content that appears digitally created. Many earlier posts from the same page include scenes that are unrealistic, such as wrecked aircraft in desolate areas or buildings collapsing in unnatural ways. In the current video, for instance, the fighter jets shown have multiple wings, which is not technically or aerodynamically possible in real life. The profile’s bio, which reads "Resistance of Artificial Intelligence," suggests that the page intentionally focuses on sharing AI-generated or fictional content.
We also ran the viral post through Tenorshare.AI for Deep-Fake detection, and the result came 94% AI. All findings resulting from our research established that the video is synthetic and unrelated to any event occurring in Israel, and therefore debunked a false narrative propagated on social media.
Conclusion:
Our research found that the video is fake and contains AI-generated images and is not related to any real missile strike or destruction occurring in Israel. The source is specific to fuel the panic and misinformation in a context of already-heightened geopolitical tension. We call on viewers not to share this unverified information and to rely on trusted sources. When there are sensitive international developments, the dissemination of fake imagery can promote fear, confusion, and misinformation on a global scale.
- Claim: Real Footage of Iran’s Missile Strikes on Israel
- Claimed On: Social Media
- Fact Check: False and Misleading
Introduction
On June 2nd, 2026, even as thousands of Class 12 students across the nation flocked to submit re-evaluation and verification applications on the CBSE’s newly rolled-out On-Screen Marking (OSM) portal, a decidedly different kind of visitor had logged in an attacker carrying automation scripts, botnet traffic, and malicious intentions to either shut the system down or steal its contents. The attack, which CBSE then openly reported on its official X account, flooded the portal with 1.5 million hits in two minutes and sent over a lakh unauthorized file access attempts.
Understanding the Attack Architecture: The Two-Pronged Operation
The CBSE cyberattack was actually not a single exploit but rather a layered, orchestrated attack. The attack can be understood in two prongs:
- The DoS Attack:Firstly, attackers initiated a large-scale DoS (Denial of Service) attack, producing approximately 1.5 million requests in 120 seconds, or approximately 12,500 per second, in order to saturate the server. By overloading the systems with bogus requests, the attackers sought not just to disable the site but also to throw off security personnel from their primary task of stabilizing the portal during its launch period.
The File Probing: These attacks usually include the following methods:
- Path Traversal Attacks - Attackers will attempt to navigate outside of the current directory by supplying inputs such as "../../etc/passwd" in URL parameters or in a file upload.
- Forced Browsing / Directory Enumeration - An attacker may have used tools to attempt to find vulnerable files and directories like answer sheets, exam scans, student identification documents, and admin-related files by systematically guessing names.
- API Endpoint Fuzzing: If any REST or GraphQL API was present for the portal, the attacker may have tried sending a various number of inputs to parameters to attempt to retrieve records, find IDORs, or escalate privileges.
- Session Token Harvesting - For high-load environments, some systems may use insecure session management. Attackers would attempt to predict or guess the token to hijack another student's or administrator's session.
Why Are Educational Portals High-Value Targets?
Here's why the Indian education sector is an attractive target for cyber-attacks:
- Concentrated PII: Millions of students are present on these education portals, and their data (names, birth dates, Aadhaar linkage information, parents' details, address, education profiles, etc.) is of the highest value on the dark web and can be used for identity theft, financial fraud, credential reuse, and targeting.
- Low Investment Relative to the Data Value: The education system is chronically under-invested in cybersecurity. Many of these systems were built for a function/scale, rather than security by design, and are highly vulnerable.
- High-Pressure Launches: Launching a massive, public-facing system like the CBSE OSM verification site that needs to service millions of students on day 1 often requires time constraints that preclude proper penetration testing, stress testing, security auditing, or staged deployment; these launches often launch with numerous known security flaws.
- Large Attack Surface: The education ecosystem is comprised of many integrated systems, APIs, cloud instances, third-party systems, and authentication infrastructure. Each dependency increases the overall attack surface and provides multiple potential avenues to compromise these systems, such as IDOR, API abuse, or credential-based attacks.
- Geopolitical Motivation: Following the Op Sindoor attack in 2025, there was a significant increase in public institutions targeted by cyber-attacks with prolonged DDoS against critical systems. Highly visible, public-facing student portals catering to more than 35 million students make a tantalizing target for both nation-state attackers and hacktivist groups to cause disruption or gather intelligence.
The CBSE's Response
A balanced perspective on CBSE's public response is necessary:
- The portal did not go down and served about 14000 users at any point during the attack and had over 28000 successful submissions by 10pm June 2nd.
- In real-time, sessions are continuously being optimized for the students, and session timeouts are being extended.
- Management was on top of the situation and maintained good communication through social media.
To withstand a sustained attack volume of roughly 12,500 requests per second, CBSE would surely need more than one security control implemented on its infrastructure. In all probability, rate limiting was the primary reason it could sustain this attack volume by limiting the requests from an IP or client over a certain period of time and automatically aborting requests from systems sending automated data. This, coupled with perhaps load balancing, will distribute the attack across several systems, none of which will have become bottlenecks. Finally, it is possible that traffic could have also been routed via a Content Delivery System (CDN) or dedicated DDoS mitigation service capable of detecting and cleaning requests of malicious code before they even reach the origin servers.
Technical Recommendations
It is not sustainable for India's exam infrastructure to continue operating in a post-breach, patching-in mode forever. The systems need to embrace Privacy By Design (PBD) as an integral part of their DNA. Here are suggestions for short-term hardening and long-term resilience:
- Deploy a zero-trust file access architecture: Each request to access any file should be authenticated, authorized using role-based access control (RBAC), and logged in an immutable audit trail. Direct access to file paths should not be permissible; rather, pre-signed, time-limited tokens are recommended to control file access.
- Implement a multi-layered DDoS mitigation architecture: A combination of network edge traffic scrubbing (CDNs & DDoS mitigation services) along with rate limiting at the application layer via WAF is necessary. An Anycast-based multi-PoP architecture and pre-provisioning scrubbing capacity may further increase resiliency
- Conduct pre-launch penetration testing and red teaming exercises: Penetration testing with OWASP Top 10 audits, API security reviews, and load-based penetration testing should be conducted by CERT-In empanelled auditors prior to the launch of the examination. The red team exercise should simulate blended DoS and file-probing attacks.
- Secure Payments: The secure payment surface should support PCI-DSS Level 1 certified payments and tokenisation and employ velocity checks against automated abuse and support 3D Secure 2.0 (3DS2) on card payments.
- Implement SOC: Security operations centers (SOCs) should have real-time access to CERT-In threat feeds and ISAC intelligence, allowing them to act quickly on emerging attack vectors before anything malicious can be exploited.
- Encryption: Students' data should be encrypted with AES-256; keys should be stored separately in a Hardware Security Module (HSM) system and not co-located with the data storage system. Student data must also support the data minimisation principle, while storing it should be encrypted with AES-256 and keys should be stored securely in HSM.
- Monitoring: 24/7 SOC monitoring, ongoing vulnerability scanning on all pipelines, anomalous detection baselining, and frequent tabletop exercises for cyber resilience at 24x7 and post-examination activities.
Beyond the Breach: Governance, Accountability, and the Growing Cyber Threat to India's Education Sector
The CBSE attack is merely one example of a wider truth, a truth that extends beyond an isolated security event and highlights security as not only an issue of governance but of national security. Although it was during a period in which there was considerable change in leadership within the CBSE (some officials had been removed from their positions), and although it may be impossible to prevent administrative change, security vulnerability is an inherent risk when it cannot be ensured that the new incumbents have had knowledge transferred from the previous administration in terms of system design, vendor management, configuration, and incident response procedures. It has become apparent that a requirement for digital system governance must be considered to be just as serious a requirement as an academic and administrative governance requirement.
The attack is also indicative of a wider problem, and in 2025 there were in excess of 265 million cyber-attacks, and increasingly, critical infrastructure is being attacked by all manner of actors, including criminals, hacktivists, and state-sponsored groups. Educational institutions offer a prime target due to the amount of personal data held within their systems and the historically low security investment they tend to have. Worldwide trends that support the similar narrative of "data of immense value protected by under-resourced programs" (universities hit by ransomware and mass student data breaches included) are being constantly illustrated. For an examining body of tens of millions of students, cybersecurity cannot be an afterthought and needs to be clearly addressed within the governance and risk-management framework of the institution and, therefore, become a fundamental pillar of public trust.
Conclusion
The June 2026 cyberattack on the CBSE's OSM portal both illustrated the advancing capabilities of today's threat actors and highlighted the critical role cyber resilience must play in India's education sector. A high-volume DoS attack combined with over 100,000 file access attempts indicates a concerted and strategic operation both for disruption and the opportunity for data theft. Though the CBSE's infrastructure did hold, the attack should not offer comfort. Educational institutions are responsible for a significant amount of sensitive personal data, and they are major targets to state-sponsored and financially motivated attackers. Attacks are bound to continue. It is essential that cybersecurity become a fundamental pillar of the governance and trustworthiness of education and not a technical afterthought.
References
- CBSE Official Statement on Cyberattack, X (formerly Twitter), @cbseindia29, June 2, 2026.
- Indian Express, "CBSE OSM Row: Portal attack was a 'coordinated, two-pronged operation' says cybersecurity expert," June 3, 2026.
- Srinivas L, Joint MD & Joint CEO, 63SATS Cybertech (subsidiary of 63 moons technologies limited), was quoted in Indian Express, June 3, 2026.
- The Federal, "CBSE re-evaluation portal faces cyberattack, records 1.5 million hits in two minutes," June 2, 2026. https://thefederal.com
- CERT-In (Indian Computer Emergency Response Team), Empanelled Security Auditor Framework. https://www.cert-in.org.in
- OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security Risks, 2021 edition. https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Zero Trust Architecture (SP 800-207), August 2020. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-207
- Indian Express, "What CBSE ignored: Its own panel found glitches in dry run, said delay OSM by a year," June 3, 2026.
- Asianet Newsable, "CBSE Class 12 re-evaluation portal withstands major DoS cyberattack," June 2, 2026. https://newsable.asianetnews.com
