#FactCheck -AI-Generated Video Falsely Shows Car Stuck on Delhi–Jaipur Highway Signboard
Executive Summary
A shocking video showing a car hanging from a highway signboard is going viral on social media. The clip allegedly shows a black Mahindra Thar stuck on an overhead direction signboard on the Delhi–Jaipur Highway (NH-48). Social media users are widely sharing the video, claiming it shows a real road accident. However, a research by CyberPeace found the viral claim to be false. Our findings reveal that the circulating video is not real but AI-generated.
Claim
Social media users are sharing the clip as footage of an actual road accident. A viral post on X (formerly Twitter) claims that the incident took place on the Delhi–Jaipur Highway, showing a black Mahindra & Mahindra Thar lodged in a highway signboard.
- https://x.com/SenBaijnath/status/2024098520006029504
- https://archive.ph/cmr5e
Fact Check
On closely examining the viral video, several inconsistencies were observed that are commonly associated with AI-generated content. For instance, it appears highly improbable for a heavy vehicle to get stuck precisely at the center of a signboard at such a height. Despite the scale of the alleged incident, traffic on the highway below continues moving normally without any disruption. Additionally, the text visible on the right side of the signboard appears distorted and unusually written. To further verify the authenticity of the video, we analysed it using the AI detection tool Hive Moderation, which indicated a 99.9% probability that the video was AI-generated.
Another AI image detection tool, WasitAI, also found that the visuals in the viral clip were largely AI-generated.
Conclusion
Based on our research and available evidence, it is clear that the viral video showing a Mahindra Thar hanging from a highway signboard is not real but AI-generated.
Related Blogs
.webp)
Executive Summary
A 20-second video showing skyscrapers submerged in water is being widely circulated on social media with the claim that it depicts the flood situation in Surat, Gujarat. The video is also being used by some users to criticize the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government in Gujarat and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Many social media users are sharing the clip as authentic footage of flooding in Surat. CyberPeace Research Wing’s research found the viral claim to be false. Our research revealed that the video is AI-generated and has no connection with Surat. While it is true that heavy rainfall caused flooding in parts of Surat and nearby districts in early July 2026, the viral video does not show any real scenes from the city.
Claim
Facebook user ‘Amresh Kumar’ shared the viral video on July 16, 2026, with the caption, “Thirty years of the Modi-BJP government. Drone footage of Gujarat Model – Surat city.”
https://www.facebook.com/reel/2440459239767277
Fact Check
To verify the claim, we first conducted a keyword search using terms related to flooding in Surat during July 2026. Our search confirmed that Surat experienced heavy rainfall during the first week of July, resulting in waterlogging and disruption in several low-lying areas. According to a report published by Bhaskar.com on July 8, 2026, intense rainfall led to flooding in several parts of Surat, and a few deaths due to electrocution were also reported.
However, none of the credible reports or images from the actual flooding resembled the scenes shown in the viral video. To further investigate, we analysed the video using multiple AI detection tools.We first scanned the video using Hive Moderation, which indicated a 99.9% probability that the footage was generated using Artificial Intelligence.
For additional verification, we examined the clip using another AI detection platform, WasItAI, which also concluded that the video had been created using AI. The analysis from multiple tools strongly suggests that the viral footage is digitally generated and does not represent a real event.
Conclusion
Our research found that the viral video being shared as drone footage of flooding in Surat is fake. Although Surat experienced heavy rainfall and flooding in early July 2026, the video circulating on social media is AI-generated and has no connection with the actual situation in the city. The clip is being falsely shared to spread misleading information.
Introduction
Parliament is about to begin its Monsoon Session from July 20, 2026 to August 13, 2026, and the mood in Delhi already feels charged. Ahead of the opening bell, the government has flagged five new bills for introduction, alongside a couple of pending pieces of legislation it may take up for passage. Predictably, the political oxygen in the run-up has gone almost entirely to what isn't on that list — reports this week noted the conspicuous absence of the long-anticipated Delimitation Bill and a Constitutional amendment for women's reservation in the Lok Sabha, a gap that has already drawn sharp reactions from Congress leaders. What is on the list has generated its own share of noise: a Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill that NGOs are watching warily, a Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill tied to safeguards for the National Flag and Anthem, and a Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill proposing to raise the Court's sanctioned strength from 33 to 37. Every one of these will command its share of prime-time debate. But tucked quietly among the five is a bill that, headline for headline, may end up mattering more to the everyday Indian economy than all the others combined: the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026.
MSMEs play a foundational role in India’s economic engine, powering employment, entrepreneurship and growth across the country. That makes this Bill one worth watching closely, because even seemingly technical changes to the MSME framework could have very real consequences for millions of businesses and the people whose livelihoods depend on them.
What the Bill Actually Does
The MSME sector hasn't seen a structural legal update since the original MSMED Act of 2006 nearly two decades in an economy that looks nothing like it did back then. The new amendment is designed to close that gap. According to the government's own description of the bill, it aims to align the 2006 law with the sector's changed realities, improve ease of doing business, and shift toward what officials are calling "trust-based" regulation rather than a purely compliance-driven approach.
Three provisions stand out.
- First, it strengthens the mechanism for resolving delayed payments to micro and small enterprises, arguably the single biggest complaint MSME owners have voiced for years.
- Second, it creates a pathway to enforce arbitral awards specifically for micro and small units, giving smaller suppliers real teeth when a dispute is decided in their favor.
- Third, it gives states more flexibility in deciding the composition of Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Councils (MSEFCs) , the bodies that adjudicate payment disputes which should allow more councils to be formed and cut down on case backlogs.
The Delayed Payment Crisis, in Numbers
To understand why this matters, look at the scale of the problem the bill is trying to fix. The MSME Ministry's Samadhaan portal, which lets small enterprises file delayed-payment complaints online, had received close to 2.57 lakh applications as of June 2026, involving claimed dues of roughly ₹55,244 crore. Of these, only about 58,000 cases had actually been resolved by facilitation councils. That's a resolution rate that leaves the vast majority of small businesses waiting often for money already owed to them for goods or services delivered.
The government did tighten the screws somewhat in 2024 through Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act, which denies large buyers a tax deduction if they don't pay MSME suppliers within the 15-to-45-day window mandated by law. Enforcement, however, has remained patchy, and industry bodies like Assocham have continued to flag delayed payments including from PSUs and government departments as a core source of financial stress for small firms, with high interest charges on overdue statutory dues compounding the problem.
Why This Is Bigger Than One Bill
A regulation targeting the payments practices of India's micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises is more than just paperwork and procedural wrangling; the stakes for the Indian economy and society are enormous. According to the 2025-26 Economic Survey, MSMEs now contribute about 31.1% of India’s GDP, 35.4% of its manufacturing output, and 48.58% of its exports, while employing 33 to 39 crore people and providing India’s second largest source of employment after agriculture. The official Udyam database of MSMEs crossed the 8.7 crore mark by June 2026, underscoring a clear trend towards the sector’s formalisation in the last few years. Access to finance is the second pillar of MSME empowerment. The Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises has authorised several lakh crores in guarantees, and most recently, the government increased its loan guarantee cover ceiling from Rs 5 crore to Rs 10 crore to facilitate more collateral-free loans to businesses. However, the actual credit gap remains estimated in the tens of lakh crores, with the biggest gaps faced by women-led and medium enterprises. While the MSME Bill doesn’t directly address access to finance, improved and quicker payment settlement mechanisms are expected to relieve some working-capital stress and dissuade small firms from falling into expensive informal credit markets. The MSME Bill also adds to a wave of recent measures to de-regulate smaller enterprises, such as the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill that was passed earlier in 2026. That Bill modified or deleted criminal offences with a more lenient civil equivalent across numerous central acts, a change industry lobby FISME called a significant move towards ease of doing business.
The Data Protection Clock Is Already Ticking - The Gap Payment Reform Won't Close
It's also worth noting that India's Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 is now in force, with rules notified in November 2025 and full compliance — including breach notification, security safeguards. With nearly half of Indian small businesses already reporting cyber incidents each year, MSMEs have a narrowing runway to build the security practices this regime will expect of them. Given that scale of exposure, there's a real case for the MSME Amendment Bill, or a companion policy, to go further — mandating baseline cyber-hygiene standards for Udyam-registered firms or tying credit-guarantee schemes to demonstrated security practices. Payment reform alone protects an MSME's right to be paid; it does little to protect what happens to that money, or that data, once it arrives.Payment reform alone protects an MSME's right to be paid; it does little to protect what happens to that money, or that data, once it arrives. CyberPeace calls on relevant agencies to issue clearer advisories and introduce additional, cost-friendly cybersecurity safeguards tailored to MSMEs' limited budgets and IT capacity.
What to Watch For
Whether the MSME Bill gets the attention it deserves during this session is an open question. With the Opposition expected to spend political capital on delimitation, the Vande Mataram bill, unemployment, inflation, and the NEET paper-leak controversy, a technical amendment to an enterprise development law is unlikely to dominate floor debate even though it may end up affecting more households than any single headline bill this session.
Conclusion
For India's roughly 7-8 crore MSMEs, most of them family-run and thinly capitalised, the details that get finalised in the coming weeks how MSEFCs are reconstituted, how arbitral awards get enforced, how "trust-based" regulation is actually defined will matter far more than who wins the argument over delimitation. It's worth watching this one closely, even if the cameras are pointed elsewhere.
Sources
- https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/vande-mataram-bill-among-five-new-legislations-listed-for-monsoon-session-126071601319_1.html
- https://www.prokerala.com/news/articles/a1780267.html
Executive Summary
A video circulating on social media shows a woman using abusive language in front of a camera. Users sharing the clip claim that the woman is a professor at Galgotias University and that the video exposes her alleged reality. However, an research by CyberPeace found the claim to be misleading. The probe revealed that the woman seen in the viral video has no connection with Galgotias University and is not a professor there.Fact-checking further showed that the video is not recent but around seven years old. The woman featured in the clip was identified as Shubhrastha, who is a political strategist by profession.
Claim:
A user on X (formerly Twitter) shared the viral video on February 18, 2026, claiming: “A ‘class in abuse studies’ at Galgotias University? An obscene video of a professor teaching ethics has gone viral. Another shameful chapter has been added to the list of controversies surrounding Galgotias University.” The post further alleged that after falsely claiming a Chinese robot as its own, the university’s “Culture and Ethics” faculty member was seen publicly using abusive language in the viral clip. The post link and its archived version are provided below:
Fact Check:
To verify the authenticity of the viral claim, we extracted key frames from the video and conducted a reverse image search using Google Lens. During the research , we found the same video uploaded on the Indian Spectator’s YouTube channel on June 9, 2018
The video was also found on another YouTube channel, where it had been uploaded on June 12, 2018.
Conclusion
The research clearly establishes that the woman seen in the viral video has no association with Galgotias University and is not a professor there. The clip is also not recent but approximately seven years old. The woman in the video was identified as Shubhrastha, a political strategist.
