#FactCheck - Fake Quote Attributed To Manoj Tiwari On Rupee-Dollar Value Goes Viral Online

Introduction

In a world where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is already changing the creation and consumption of content at a breathtaking pace, distinguishing between genuine media and false or doctored content is a serious issue of international concern. AI-generated content in the form of deepfakes, synthetic text and photorealistic images is being used to disseminate misinformation, shape public opinion and commit fraud. As a response, governments, tech companies and regulatory bodies are exploring ‘watermarking’ as a key mechanism to promote transparency and accountability in AI-generated media. Watermarking embeds identifiable information into content to indicate its artificial origin. 

Government Strategies Worldwide

Governments worldwide have pursued different strategies to address AI-generated media through watermarking standards. In the US, President Biden's 2023 Executive Order on AI directed the Department of Commerce and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to establish clear guidelines for digital watermarking of AI-generated content. This action puts a big responsibility on large technology firms to put identifiers in media produced by generative models. These identifiers should help fight misinformation and address digital trust.

The European Union, in its Artificial Intelligence Act of 2024, requires AI-generated content to be labelled. Article 50 of the Act specifically demands that developers indicate whenever users engage with synthetic content. In addition, the EU is a proponent of the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA), an organisation that produces secure metadata standards to track the origin and changes of digital content.

India is currently in the process of developing policy frameworks to address AI and synthetic content, guided by judicial decisions that are helping shape the approach. In 2024, the Delhi High Court directed the central government to appoint members for a committee responsible for regulating deepfakes. Such moves indicate the government's willingness to regulate AI-generated content. 

China, has already implemented mandatory watermarking on all deep synthesis content. Digital identifiers must be embedded in AI media by service providers, and China is one of the first countries to adopt stern watermarking legislation.

Understanding the Technical Feasibility

Watermarking AI media means inserting recognisable markers into digital material. They can be perceptible, such as logos or overlays or imperceptible, such as cryptographic tags or metadata. Sophisticated methods such as Google's SynthID apply imperceptible pixel-level changes that remain intact against standard image manipulation such as resizing or compression. Likewise, C2PA metadata standards enable the user to track the source and provenance of an item of content.

Nonetheless, watermarking is not an infallible process. Most watermarking methods are susceptible to tampering. Aforementioned adversaries with expertise, for instance, can use cropping editing or AI software to delete visible watermarks or remove metadata. Further, the absence of interoperability between different watermarking systems and platforms hampers their effectiveness. Scalability is also an issue enacting and authenticating watermarks for billions of units of online content necessitates huge computational efforts and routine policy enforcement across platforms. Scientists are currently working on solutions such as blockchain-based content authentication and zero-knowledge watermarking, which maintain authenticity without sacrificing privacy. These new techniques have potential for overcoming technical deficiencies and making watermarking more secure.

Challenges in Enforcement

Though increasing agreement exists for watermarking, implementation of such policies is still a major issue. Jurisdictional constraints prevent enforceability globally. A watermarking policy within one nation might not extend to content created or stored in another, particularly across decentralised or anonymous domains. This creates an exigency for international coordination and the development of worldwide digital trust standards. While it is a welcome step that platforms like Meta, YouTube, and TikTok have begun flagging AI-generated content, there remains a pressing need for a standardised policy that ensures consistency and accountability across all platforms. Voluntary compliance alone is insufficient without clear global mandates.

User literacy is also a significant hurdle. Even when content is properly watermarked, users might not see or comprehend its meaning. This aligns with issues of dealing with misinformation, wherein it's not sufficient just to mark off fake content, users need to be taught how to think critically about the information they're using. Public education campaigns, digital media literacy and embedding watermarking labels within user-friendly UI elements are necessary to ensure this technology is actually effective.

Balancing Privacy and Transparency

While watermarking serves to achieve digital transparency, it also presents privacy issues. In certain instances, watermarking might necessitate the embedding of metadata that will disclose the source or identity of the content producer. This threatens journalists, whistleblowers, activists, and artists utilising AI tools for creative or informative reasons. Governments have a responsibility to ensure that watermarking norms do not violate freedom of expression or facilitate surveillance. The solution is to achieve a balance by employing privacy-protection watermarking strategies that verify the origin of the content without revealing personally identifiable data. "Zero-knowledge proofs" in cryptography may assist in creating watermarking systems that guarantee authentication without undermining user anonymity.

On the transparency side, watermarking can be an effective antidote to misinformation and manipulation. For example, during the COVID-19 crisis, misinformation spread by AI on vaccines, treatments and public health interventions caused widespread impact on public behaviour and policy uptake. Watermarked content would have helped distinguish between authentic sources and manipulated media and protected public health efforts accordingly.

Best Practices and Emerging Solutions

Several programs and frameworks are at the forefront of watermarking norms. Adobe, Microsoft and others' collaborative C2PA framework puts tamper-proof metadata into images and videos, enabling complete traceability of content origin. SynthID from Google is already implemented on its Imagen text-to-image model and secretly watermarks images generated by AI without any susceptibility to tampering. The Partnership on AI (PAI) is also taking a leadership role by building out ethical standards for synthetic content, including standards around provenance and watermarking. These frameworks become guides for governments seeking to introduce equitable, effective policies. In addition, India's new legal mechanisms on misinformation and deepfake regulation present a timely point to integrate watermarking standards consistent with global practices while safeguarding civil liberties.

Conclusion

Watermarking regulations for synthetic media content are an essential step toward creating a safer and more credible digital world. As artificial media becomes increasingly indistinguishable from authentic content, the demand for transparency, origin, and responsibility increases. Governments, platforms, and civil society organisations will have to collaborate to deploy watermarking mechanisms that are technically feasible, compliant and privacy-friendly. India is especially at a turning point, with courts calling for action and regulatory agencies starting to take on the challenge. Empowering themselves with global lessons, applying best-in-class watermarking platforms and promoting public awareness can enable the nation to acquire a level of resilience against digital deception. 

References

1. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/
2. https://www.cyberpeace.org/resources/blogs/delhi-high-court-directs-centre-to-nominate-members-for-deepfake-committee
3.  https://c2pa.org
4. https://www.cyberpeace.org/resources/blogs/misinformations-impact-on-public-health-policy-decisions
5.  https://deepmind.google/technologies/synthid/
6. https://www.imatag.com/blog/china-regulates-ai-generated-content-towards-a-new-global-standard-for-transparency

‍

Introduction

‍

In today’s hyper-connected world, information spreads faster than ever before. But while much attention is focused on public platforms like Facebook and Twitter, a different challenge lurks in the shadows: misinformation circulating on encrypted and closed-network platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram. Unlike open platforms where harmful content can be flagged in public, private groups operate behind a digital curtain. Here, falsehoods often spread unchecked, gaining legitimacy because they are shared by trusted contacts. This makes encrypted platforms a double-edged sword. It is essential for privacy and free expression, yet uniquely vulnerable to misuse.

As Prime Minister Narendra Modi rightly reminded,

‍

‍“Think 10 times before forwarding anything,” warning that even a “single fake news has the capability to snowball into a matter of national concern.”

‍

The Moderation Challenge with End-to-End Encryption

‍

Encrypted messaging platforms were built to protect personal communication. Yet, the same end-to-end encryption that shields users’ privacy also creates a blind spot for moderation. Authorities, researchers, and even the platforms themselves cannot view content circulating in private groups, making fact-checking nearly impossible.

Trust within closed groups makes the problem worse. When a message comes from family, friends, or community leaders, people tend to believe it without questioning and quickly pass it along. Features like large group chats, broadcast lists, and “forward to many” options further speed up its spread. Unlike open networks, there is no public scrutiny, no visible counter-narrative, and no opportunity for timely correction.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, false claims about vaccines spread widely through WhatsApp groups, undermining public health campaigns. Even more alarming, WhatsApp rumors about child kidnappers and cow meat in India triggered mob lynchings, leading to the tragic loss of life.

Encrypted platforms, therefore, represent a unique challenge: they are designed to protect privacy, but, unintentionally, they also protect the spread of dangerous misinformation.

‍

Approaches to Curbing Misinformation on End-to-End Platforms

‍

• Regulatory: Governments worldwide are exploring ways to access encrypted data on messaging platforms, creating tensions between the right to user privacy and crime prevention. Approaches like traceability requirements on WhatsApp, data-sharing mandates for platforms in serious cases, and stronger obligations to act against harmful viral content are also being considered.
• Technological Interventions: Platforms like WhatsApp have introduced features such as “forwarded many times” labels and limits on mass forwarding. These tools can be expanded further by introducing AI-driven link-checking and warnings for suspicious content.

• Community-Based Interventions: Ultimately, no regulation or technology can succeed without public awareness. People need to be inoculated against misinformation through pre-bunking efforts and digital literacy campaigns. Fact-checking websites and tools also have to be taught.

‍

Best Practices for Netizens

‍

Experts recommend simple yet powerful habits that every user can adopt to protect themselves and others. By adopting these, ordinary users can become the first line of defence against misinformation in their own communities:

• Cross-Check Before Forwarding: Verify claims from trusted platforms & official sources.
• Beware of Sensational Content: Headlines that sound too shocking or dramatic probably need checking. Consult multiple sources for a piece of news. If only one platform/ channel is carrying sensational news, it is likely to be clickbait or outright false.
• Stick to Trusted News Sources: Verify news through national newspapers and expert commentary. Remember, not everything on the internet/television is true.
• Look Out for Manipulated Media: Now, with AI-generated deepfakes, it becomes more difficult to tell the difference between original and manipulated media. Check for edited images, cropped videos, or voice messages without source information. Always cross-verify any media received.
• Report Harmful Content: Report misinformation to the platform it is being circulated on and PIB’s Fact Check Unit.

‍

Conclusion

‍

In closed, unmonitored groups, platforms like WhatsApp and Telegram often become safe havens where people trust and forward messages from friends and family without question. Once misinformation takes root, it becomes extremely difficult to challenge or correct, and over time, such actions can snowball into serious social, economic and national concerns.

Preventing this is a matter of shared responsibility. Governments can frame balanced regulations, but individuals must also take initiative: pause, think, and verify before sharing. Ultimately, the right to privacy must be upheld, but with reasonable safeguards to ensure it is not misused at the cost of societal trust and safety.

‍

References

‍

• India WhatsApp ‘child kidnap’ rumours claim two more victims (BBC) The people trying to fight fake news in India (BBC)
• Press Information Bureau – PIB Fact Check
• Brookings Institution – Encryption and Misinformation Report (2021)
• Curtis, T. L., Touzel, M. P., Garneau, W., Gruaz, M., Pinder, M., Wang, L. W., Krishna, S., Cohen, L., Godbout, J.-F., Rabbany, R., & Pelrine, K. (2024). Veracity: An Open-Source AI Fact-Checking System. arXiv.
• NDTV – PM Modi cautions against fake news (2022)
• Times of India – Govt may insist on WhatsApp traceability (2019)
• Medianama – Telegram refused to share ISIS channel data (2019)

‍

Introduction

‍

In the sprawling and ever-evolving landscape of cybercrime, phishing links, phoney emails, and dubious investment offers are no longer the only tools used by scammers. Cybercriminals are becoming skilled at taking advantage of commonplace digital behaviours, undermining confidence, and turning popular features of our most essential apps into weapons. A fast expanding international threat has been revealed by the National Cybercrime Threat Analytics Unit (NCTAU) of the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre(I4C)’s most recent advisory on “WhatsApp account renting”. This scam uses QR codes to trick users into connecting their WhatsApp accounts to fraudulent sites under the guise of a “quick income” opportunity. What initially appears innocuous turns into a tool for thieves to take control of accounts and use them for illicit purposes. 

‍

The Global Rise of Cyber Mule Networks

‍

Initially the word “mule” in cybercrime networks referred to a bank account used, knowingly often unknowingly, to transfer or “launder” money obtained from fraud and illegal activities. In light of the evolving nature of this cybercrime, Cyber mules in the present scenario can be referred to as, individuals who knowingly or unknowingly allow their digital identities, devices, or bank accounts to be used for illegal activity. 

Various cybersecurity companies as well as Europol and Interpol, have frequently cautioned that hackers are increasingly using digital mule recruiting, which frequently takes the form of the following:

• Work-from-home Offers
• Streams of passive income
• Monetisation of social media
• Roles for verification assistants 
• Apps that earn commissions

Earlier versions involved money transfers through personal bank accounts . Criminals now want your digital identity rather than just your money, as the trend has been reported to be changing. 

Scammers frequently “rent” victims’ Facebook, LINE, Telegram, and WeChat accounts in parts of Southeast Asia and Africa in order to conduct impersonation frauds or assist with criminal operations. The WhatsApp variant that is making its way to India is a logical progression, although it comes only with the widely used WhatsApp Web linked-device capability. 

‍

How the WhatsApp Account Renting Scam Works

‍

I4C’s advisory dated 15th October, 2025, highlights a sophisticated yet psychologically simple scheme that exploits trust, curiosity, and the illusion of easy income.The scam’s lifetime is as follows:

‍

‍1. The Hook: “Automatically Earn Passive Income”

Threat actors claim users can earn daily rewards by connecting their WhatsApp accounts to a new “partner platform” in their polished and professional Instagram and Facebook ads.

This strategy imitates international scam factories in Cambodia and Myanmar, where victims are lured into investment schemes or bogus tasks by social media advertisements.

‍‍

2.The Redirect: Rogue APKs & Fake Websites

When victims click on the advertisement, they are sent to

• Fake dashboards for earnings 
• Untrustworthy websites that imitate authentic financial interfaces
• Instructions for installing Android APKs from sources other than the Play Store
• These APKs often carry spyware or remote-access malware.

‍‍

3.The Trap: Scanning a QR Code

The user is asked to scan a QR code through WhatsApp’s “Linked Devices” feature, which is normally used for WhatsApp Web.

Without ever touching the victim’s phone, the con artist obtains complete session access to their WhatsApp account as soon as the QR is scanned.

Threat actors are able to:

• Transmit and receive messages
• Get access to contact lists 
• Participate in or start groups 
• Assume the victim’s identity
• Conduct frauds using their identities

‍

4.The Illusion: A Multi-Level Commission Structure

A pyramid-style earnings model is displayed to maintain credibility:

• 10% off direct invites
• 5% of secondary invites
• 2% of tertiary invitations

These figures are designed to encourage victims to recruit more users, increasing the number of compromised WhatsApp accounts.

‍‍

5.The Misuse: “Mule WhatsApp accounts”

The victim’s account becomes a digital mule once it is connected, allowing fraudsters to:

• Start UPI fraud and phishing
• Distribute harmful links
• Impersonate the victim to scam their contacts
• Participate in bulk messaging campaigns
• Get additional mule accounts

Precautions Issued by I4C

I4C has advised citizens to take the following precautions:

• You could face criminal charges or similar consequences if you carelessly rent or link your WhatsApp account for money
• Installing APKs from non-official app shops should be avoided
• Advertisements that promise automatic revenue, referral bonuses, or passive income should be avoided.
• Regularly check linked devices on WhatsApp: Settings → Linked Devices
• Use WhatsApp’s Official support page to report hacked accounts or impersonation: https://www.whatsapp.com/contact/forms/1534459096974129 
• Report financial fraud immediately by calling 1930 or visiting cybercrime.gov.in 

‍

CyberPeace Outlook

‍

The WhatsApp account rental fraud is not an isolated phenomenon; rather, it is the latest mutation of a global cybercrime apparatus that feeds on social engineering, digital identity theft, and international mule networks. Its simplicity, all it takes to take over your digital life is a QR code scan, makes it especially hazardous. I4C’s timely warning serves as an important reminder that easy money is nearly always a trap in the digital world and that, if we let our guard down, our most reliable platforms can become attack surfaces. Stay informed, and stay safe. In order to protect our identities, data, and communities, cyber hygiene is now a must.  

‍

References 

‍

• https://www.cnbctv18.com/personal-finance/mule-account-fraud-on-the-rise-what-it-is-and-how-to-shttps://i4c.mha.gov.in/theme/resources/advisories/Mule%20Whatsapp%20V1.4.pdftay-safe-19662507.htm 
• https://i4c.mha.gov.in/theme/resources/advisories/Mule%20Whatsapp%20V1.4.pdf 

‍