#FactCheck - Fake Graphic Falsely Claims Amit Shah Urged People to Skip Meals Amid Crisis Rumours
Executive Summary
A graphic widely circulating on social media claims that Union Home Minister Amit Shah has warned, “A major crisis is coming; if possible, skip one meal a day.” The claim has been found to be false in a fact-check conducted by CyberPeace Research Wing. The research revealed that Amit Shah has not made any such statement.
Claim
A Facebook user shared the viral graphic on May 17, 2026, claiming that BJP leader and Home Minister Amit Shah issued a “warning” to the public, allegedly saying people should be prepared for a major crisis and consider skipping one meal a day. The post has been widely circulated on social media, drawing significant attention and discussion.
- https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1509406197622070&set=pb.100056581115590.-2207520000&type=3
- https://archive.ph/Z9Tle

Factcheck
A keyword-based search on Google did not return any credible news reports supporting the claim. Further scrutiny of the official account of the Ministry of Home Affairs on X also found no mention or statement matching the viral claim.

A separate review of the official X account of Home Minister Amit Shah also did not show any such statement or post confirming the viral claim.

Conclusion
The viral claim is false. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has not made any such statement.
Related Blogs

Executive Summary:
A video circulating on social media falsely claims that India’s Finance Minister, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, has endorsed an investment platform promising unusually high returns. Upon investigation, it was confirmed that the video is a deepfake—digitally manipulated using artificial intelligence. The Finance Minister has made no such endorsement through any official platform. This incident highlights a concerning trend of scammers using AI-generated videos to create misleading and seemingly legitimate advertisements to deceive the public.

Claim:
A viral video falsely claims that the Finance Minister of India Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman is endorsing an investment platform, promoting it as a secure and highly profitable scheme for Indian citizens. The video alleges that individuals can start with an investment of ₹22,000 and earn up to ₹25 lakh per month as guaranteed daily income.

Fact check:
By doing a reverse image search from the key frames of the viral fake video we found an original YouTube clip of the Finance Minister of India delivering a speech on the webinar regarding 'Regulatory, Investment and EODB reforms'. Upon further research we have not found anything related to the viral investment scheme in the whole video.
The manipulated video has had an AI-generated voice/audio and scripted text injected into it to make it appear as if she has approved an investment platform.

The key to deepfakes is that they seem relatively realistic in their facial movement; however, if you look closely, you can see that there are mismatched lip-syncing and visual transitions that are out of the ordinary, and the results prove our point.


Also, there doesn't appear to be any acknowledgment of any such endorsement from a legitimate government website or a credible news outlet. This video is a fabricated piece of misinformation to attempt to scam the viewers by leveraging the image of a trusted public figure.
Conclusion:
The viral video showing the Finance Minister of India, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman promoting an investment platform is fake and AI-generated. This is a clear case of deepfake misuse aimed at misleading the public and luring individuals into fraudulent schemes. Citizens are advised to exercise caution, verify any such claims through official government channels, and refrain from clicking on unknown investment links circulating on social media.
- Claim: Nirmala Sitharaman promoted an investment app in a viral video.
- Claimed On: Social Media
- Fact Check: False and Misleading
.webp)
Introduction
Personalised advertisements deploy a mechanism that derives from the collection of the user’s data. Although it allows for a more tailored user experience, one cannot ignore the method through which this is achieved. Recently, as per a report by the Indian Express on 13th November 2024, Meta has come up with a less personalised ad option on Facebook and Instagram for its users in the European Union (EU). This was done due to the incompatibility of their previous ad offer with the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA).
Relevant Legislation
In October 2023, Meta came up with a “Pay or Consent” option for their users in the EU. It gave the users two options: either to pay a monthly subscription fee to avail of the ad-free usage variant of Facebook and Instagram, or to give consent to see personalised ads based on the user’s data. This consent model was introduced in their attempts to comply with the EU’s DMA. However, this was found to be incompatible with the said mandate, according to the EU regulators, as they believed that the users should not only have the option to consent to ads but also have access to less personalised but equivalent alternatives. It is this decision that pushed Meta to come up with less personalised ad options for users in the EU. The less-personalised ad option claims to rely on limited data and show ads that are only based on the context of what is being viewed i.e. during a Facebook or Instagram session requiring a minimum set of data points such as location, age, gender, and the user’s engagement with the ads. However, choosing this option also allows for such ads to be less skippable.
The EU’s Digital Markets Act came into force on November 1, 2022. The purpose was to make the digital marketing sector fairer and in doing so, identify what they consider to be “Gatekeepers” (core platform services such as messenger services, search engines, and app stores) and a list of do’s and don’ts for them. One of them, applicable to the case mentioned above, is the effective consent required by the user in case the gatekeeper decides to target advertisements enabled by tracking the users' activity outside the gatekeeper's core platform services.
The Indian Context
Although no such issues have been raised in India yet, it is imperative to know that in the Indian context, the DPDP (Digital Personal Data Protection) Act 2023 governs personal data regulation. This includes rules for Data Fiduciaries (those who, alone or in partnership with others, determine the means and purpose of processing personal data), the Data Principal (those who give data), Consent Managers, and even rules regarding processing data of children.
CyberPeace Recommendations:
At the level of the user, one can take steps to ensure limited collection of personal data by following the mentioned steps:
- Review Privacy Settings- Reviewing Privacy settings for one’s online accounts and devices is a healthy practice to avoid giving unnecessary information to third-party applications.
- Private Browsing- Browsing through private mode or incognito is encouraged, as it prevents websites from tracking your activity and personal data.
- Using Ad-blockers- Certain websites have a user option to block ads when the user first visits their page. Availing of this prevents spam advertisements from the respective websites.
- Using VPN- Using Virtual Private Networks enables users to hide their IP address and their data to be encrypted, preventing third-party actors from tracking the users' online activities
- Other steps include clearing cookies and cache data and using the location-sharing feature with care.
Conclusion
Meta’s compliance with the EU’s DMA signals that social media platforms cannot circumnavigate their way around rules. Balancing the services provided while respecting user privacy is of the utmost importance. The EU has set precedence for a system that respects this and can be used as an example to help set guidelines for how other countries can continue to deal with similar issues and set standards accordingly.
References
- https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/tech-news-technology/meta-less-personalised-ads-eu-regulatory-demands-9667266/
- https://rainmaker.co.in/blog/view/the-price-of-personalization-how-targeted-advertising-breaches-data-privacy-and-challenges-the-gdprs-shield
- https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/magazine-features/fines-data-protection-violations/
- https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2023/09/01/the-landscape-of-personalized-advertising-efficiency-versus-privacy/
- https://iapp.org/news/a/pay-or-consent-personalized-ads-the-rules-and-whats-next
- https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/how-to/how-to-safeguard-privacy-in-the-era-of-personalised-ads/articleshow/102748711.cms?from=mdr
- https://www.business-standard.com/technology/tech-news/facebook-instagram-users-in-europe-can-opt-for-less-personalised-ads-124111201558_1.html
- https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/about-dma_en

Introduction
In today's relentless current of information, where social media is oftentimes both the stage and the playwright, the line between reality and spectacle can become distressingly blurry. In such a virtual Pantheon, the conflation of truth and fiction has recently surfaced in a particularly contentious instance. The central figure is Poonam Pandey, an entertainment personality known for transgressing traditional contours of celebrity boldness. Pandey found herself ensnared in a narrative of her own orchestration—a grim hoax purporting she had succumbed to cervical cancer. This deceptive foray, rather than awakening public consciousness as intended, spiralled into an ominous fable about the malignant spread of misinformation and the profound moral dilemmas it engenders.
The Deception
The tapestry of this event was woven with threads of tragedy and deception, framing Pandey both as the tragic hero and the ill-fated architect of a spectacle that unfolded with a haunting familiarity evocative of ancient Greek dramas. The monumental pillar of social media, on what seemed to be an ordinary day, was shattered by the startling declaration of Pandey's untimely passing. The statement, as bereft of nuance as it was devastating, proclaimed: 'We are deeply grieved to announce the loss of our cherished Poonam to cervical cancer.' The emotional pulse of the Indian Film Industry was jolted; waves of homage inundated the digital space, each tribute a poignant echo of the shock that rippled through her fanbase. Yet the crux of the matter had yet to be unveiled.
As the world grappled with this news, the scenario took an unforeseen detour. Poonam Pandey made a re-entrance onto the world stage, alive, revealing her alleged demise to be nothing more than a macabre masquerade. The public's reaction to this revelation was a stratified symphony of emotions—indignation mingled with disbelief, with an underlying crescendo of betrayal. Pandey's defense postured her act as a last resort to draw attention to the silent yet pervasive threat of cervical cancer. In the ensuing mire of reactions, an inescapable quandary emerged: is it ever permissible to employ deceit for the sake of presumed publicity?
The Chaos
Satyajeet Tambe, an esteemed Maharashtra legislator, emerged amidst the churning chaos as a paragon of principled reason. Advocating that such mendacious stunts, playing the chords of public emotion and adulterating truth, should be met with legal repercussions, Tambe called for judicious action against Pandey. His imploration resonated with the necessity of integrity in the public domain, stating, 'The announcement of an influencer/model succumbing to cervical cancer should not be wielded as a tool for awareness.' His pronouncement sent reverberations through the collective conscience, echoing the need for accountability in the face of such transgressions.
Repercussion
The All Indian Cine Workers Association, a custodian of the film industry's values, also voiced its reproach. They urged for an FIR to be lodged against Poonam Pandey, underlining their sentiments with disappointment and a keen sense of betrayal. Within their condemnation lay a profound recognition of the elevated emotional investment inherent in their industry—an industry where the reverence for life and the abhorrence of deceit intertwine, making the cultivation of such lowly stunts anathema.
This spectacle, while unique in the temerity of its execution, mirrors the broader pathological wave of misinformation that corrodes the foundations of our digital era: the malady of fake news. When delineated, fake news finds its essence as information chiselled specifically to deceive, a form of communication that is not merely slanted but entirely devoid of authenticity, manufactured with nefarious intent. A protean adversary, fake news adeptly masquerades as trustworthy news, ensnaring the unsuspecting in its tendrils. Its purveyors span a spectrum—from shadowy figures to ostensibly benign social media accounts—all contributing to a dystopian fabric where truth is persistently imperilled.
The conjurers of these illusions are, in a sense, cunning illusionists ensconced behind curtains of anonymity or masquerading under a cloak of transparency. They craft elaborate illusions devoid of truth, but dripping with sufficient plausibility to ensnare those who yearn for simplicity in an increasingly complex world. Destabilizing forces, such as hyper partisan media outlets, regurgitate a concoction of concocted 'facts' and distortions, deliberately smudging the once-clear line between empirical truth and partisan fabrication.
The Aftermath
The Poonam Pandey episode stands as a harrowing beacon of the ethical abyss we face. It compels us to confront the irony of utilising falsity to raise awareness for laudable causes and considers the ramifications for public figures influencing the dissemination of information. The tempest around this event demonstrates the potent gravitational pull of information and the overarching need for the conscientious stewardship of its power.
Yet, as we sail through the murky waters of the digital expanse, where the allure of sensationalism and clickbait headlines is ever-present, our vigilance must not wane. The imperative of truth cannot come at the altar of awareness or sensationalism. The sanctity of fact anchors our understanding of reality; devoid of it, we are adrift in an ocean of confusion and misinformation.
In the dust settled after the Poonam Pandey debacle, the contours of a new discourse have emerged, harboring vital interrogations. How do we balance the drive for poignant awareness initiatives against the cardinal principle of truth? What mechanisms can ensure that health campaigns and their noble aspirations are not tainted by the allure of deception? Addressing these queries is not a solitary task for policymakers or influencers but, indeed, a collective societal responsibility that will define our cultural ethics and the legacy we wish to preserve.
Conclusion
As we contemplate the broader implications of this incident, let us not allow its sensational nature to eclipse the very real and pressing issue of cervical cancer—a condition that, beyond the glare of controversy, continues to shadow lives with its lethal silence. Instead, let our focus pivot towards tangible, truth-driven efforts aimed at education and empowerment. Truth, after all, is the beacon that dispels the murky shadows of ignorance and guides us toward enlightenment and healing.
References
- https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/poonam-pandey-in-trouble-as-maharashtra-politician-seeks-case-for-faking-her-death-101707005742992.html
- https://www.nagpurtoday.in/state-mlc-tambe-demands-police-action-against-poonam-pandey-for-faking-her-death/02051417