#FactCheck-Two Old Videos Falsely Linked to Devastating Floods in Nepal

Introduction
‍

When Tamil Nadu Police arrested a man from Vellore in May 2026 on suspicion of being the point person helping Indian youth to be smuggled into cyber scam compounds in Cambodia, the papers led with the accused. They shouldn't have led with the accused but with the system. The arrest, one in a long string of them in Tamil Nadu, Madurai, and other states, is not simply another one-off policing victory. Rather, the arrest gives us an insight into a larger, darker world: an international criminal organisation that has successfully combined human trafficking and cybercrime, a new trend in criminality that specialists are calling 'cyber slavery.'
‍

What Is Cyber Slavery?

“Cyber slavery” involves trafficking persons under the pretence of employment, forcing them into committing online fraud to serve criminal enterprises. Victims are not merely victims of the work they are forced to do; they are often turned into culprits as they become complicit in victimising others. Trafficked victims are compelled to participate in frauds targeted at unsuspecting victims all around the globe. These activities, organised into robust criminal schemes, involve victims of sex or labour trafficking who are forced into operating romance scams or the so-called "pig butchering" scams that defraud people of their investment in cryptocurrency, all in heavily secured complexes guarded with threats of violence and torture. The extent of the problem is enormous, with the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights estimating in a 2023 report that there are over 100,000 victims of cyber scam compounds in Cambodia and another 120,000 in Myanmar. Schemes throughout Southeast Asia were projected to commit as much as $39.9 billion in fraudulent schemes a year.
‍

Why Southeast Asia? The Geography of Organised Crime
‍

In order to answer why Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, and the surrounding regions have developed into the cyber slavery hub of the world, we can draw together an array of structural reasons:

• Casino clampdown and crime diversification: Cambodia's ban on online gambling in 2019 broke down established casino-related criminal networks. This saw old casinos and Special Economic Zones turn into cyber scam compound operations.
• Corruption and state complicity: A pre-existing environment of corruption and involvement of politically linked figures permitted scamming networks to flourish, and the armed groups in the border areas of Myanmar are reportedly complicit in these operations through supplying land and protection for the networks to operate in.
• Poor governance in the border areas: The lack of state control in the frontier areas of Myanmar provided the criminal networks with a secure sanctuary in which they could operate with impunity and cross borders to escape crackdowns and move their operations.
• Post-pandemic growth: The economic stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in the supply of vulnerable individuals available to fill the scam networks, as well as unprecedented profit margins on scams.

‍

The Recruitment Pipeline: How Are Indian Youth Trapped?
‍

The typical journey from an Indian town or village to a locked compound in Southeast Asia follows the same narrative:

• The bait: On platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Telegram, gangs lure with posts of lucrative overseas employment for IT work, customer service, data entry, and digital marketing with attractive, albeit feasible, pay packages (Rs. 80,000 to Rs. 1.5 lakh per month) and destinations such as Thailand and Singapore added for a veneer of genuineness.
• The recruiters: Local agents who gain trust, arrange visas and flight tickets, and collect the application fees are key intermediaries. Cases registered in Vellore and Madurai hint at recruitment agents receiving a commission for each person successfully smuggled into a trap, linked to larger travel and immigration networks.
• The lie: Victims are assured that they will be working legitimately in Thailand, but on reaching the border and crossing over, they find themselves pushed into scam compounds in neighbouring countries and have their passports, mobile phones and devices confiscated, thus rendering any escape attempt futile.
• The trap: In the interim, fake interviews, false job promises and convincing flight tickets serve to maintain the facade until the victims are forced to participate in cyber-fraud schemes.

The Architecture of Coercion: Life Inside the Scam Compounds
‍

It is in these compounds that the fates of the victims become known. Survivor accounts, investigations and UN human rights reports provide evidence of these circumstances. These compounds are often surrounded by barbed wire fences, monitored with cameras and heavily guarded. Once a potential victim is captured, they are stripped of their passports and any other electronic devices, preventing them from being able to contact the outside world or to escape. Workers are allocated stringent targets, ranging from the number of potential victims they must solicit for scams and the amount of money they must acquire through such scams. Failure to do so, or perceived disobedience, may lead to beatings, electroshock treatment, starvation and long periods in confinement. These beatings are supplemented with psychological torture, with scammers assuring their victims that they owe money for their journey, stay and training. This method of debt bondage keeps people at the compound even when the opportunity for escape is presented to them. The victims are then forced to take part in more complex online scams, which involve romance scams, fake investment scams, and impersonation scams using scripts and with supervision. In some cases, families will be encouraged to pay for their captive relatives' release by ransom, whereas those who refuse to comply or meet performance requirements may be sold and transferred to another compound as a piece of property within a transnational criminal network.
‍

Cybercrime Is No Longer Just About Hacking
‍

This emergency challenges the existing notion of cybercrime. The scam compound of Southeast Asia is not about a lonely hacker or a standalone breach; it is a form of organised cyber slavery in which trafficked individuals are made to commit financial fraud on an industrial level.

The probe of India's NIA found that recruitment is done in the Indian states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Transport agents in Chennai and Madurai provide logistics, and Dubai and Bangkok act as transit points on the way to Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. It makes use of cryptocurrency wallets, shadow banking, and shell companies for the movement of funds across international borders. Companies such as the Huione Group has been accused of facilitating billions of dollars in financial transactions for scam infrastructure before receiving sanctions from the U.S.

To illustrate the threat landscape, the U.S. Treasury imposed sanctions on 19 entities spread across Myanmar and Cambodia and said that cyber scam operations looted $10 billion worth last year. Also, cryptocurrency transactions related to trafficking crimes jumped by 85% last year, which speaks to the expanding nature of the global criminal infrastructure.
‍

India's Exposure: A National Vulnerability
‍

The scale of exposure for India is large and expanding. The most likely victims are educated, and aspirational young men and women from Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, seeking work abroad, which perfectly aligns with the primary target of such human trafficking networks.

Repeated incidents of people from Tamil Nadu falling victim to these networks have come to light. As far back as 2022, the chief minister wrote to the prime minister that close to 300 Indians, roughly 50 Tamils included, were being held in Myanmar. The Madurai-Cambodia case that came to light in 2026 revealed an entire network spanning Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, with authorities believing that thousands of Indians might have been trafficked there over the past three years. Such cases from Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and some northern Indian states have been reported. Last year, India had to charter Air Force flights to rescue over 549 Indians from cyber scam centres along the Myanmar-Thailand border.

The Indian embassy in Phnom Penh assisted the Indian nationals along with the CBI, MEA, and NIA in the rescue of 67 Indians in September 2024; however, these operations are largely reactive in the face of the vast and evolving transboundary crisis.
‍

Prevention
‍

The best solution is awareness. The following are tangible signs that a job offer might be a lead to trafficking:

Red Flags within the job offer:

• Receiving unsolicited recruitment messages on WhatsApp, Telegram or Instagram from unknown numbers/contacts.
• Offer of unbelievably high salaries in undefined roles like ‘data entry,’ ‘online marketing’ or ‘customer service’ outside India.
• Request for upfront money to cover costs of visas, travel, accommodation, and training.
• Job offers to places in Thailand or Singapore involving complex transit routes through other countries.
• An interview process entirely through messaging apps, where the company has no real office address or registration number.
• Urgency and/or confidentiality required.

Verification:

• Check if the recruiter is registered on MEA's e-Migrate portal-this is a portal where MEA lists authorised overseas recruiters.
• Verify the authenticity of the company through its business registration with official registries in the foreign country.
• Contact the Indian Embassy/Consulate in that foreign country if something doesn't add up about the offer.
• Do not hand over your passport to your employer on arrival; it is standard practice for recruiters working as traffickers to confiscate it.

What to do if trapped:

• Contact the closest Indian embassy or consulate immediately.
• Call the MEA overseas helpline: 1800-11-3090.
• Lodge a report on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in).

Policy Imperatives
‍

On their own, individual consciousness cannot undo such a massive criminal infrastructure. India has to enforce the Emigration Act rigorously, implement mandatory licensing of recruitment agents and create a specialised task force consisting of NIA, CBI, MEA and the states’ cybercrime units. Pre-departure orientations should also become mandatory for migrant workers who go to Southeast Asia. Globally, India needs to work more closely with Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand and Laos via intel sharing protocols, victim repatriations and action against scam compounds. Financial probes must be on par with enforcement investigations to catch up with the perpetrators’ network, the cryptocurrency and hawala channels that facilitate money laundering and finance trafficking operations, as that would severely hit these networks.
‍

Conclusion
‍

This arrest of the recruiter in Vellore is just a small piece of a larger network. What we see in these instances is the marriage of cybercrime, trafficking, and financial fraud into a larger transnational ecosystem that systematically preys on the economic vulnerability of individuals. These young Indians are not simply falling for scams; they are being systematically targeted, recruited, trafficked, and forced into these criminal operations by a networked structure. The scam compounds in Cambodia and along the border of Myanmar and Thailand are only the end of a process that very likely starts with a convincing job offer on social media. Fighting cyber slavery will not be as simple as more arrests; we need education and international efforts, as well as policy responses that match the scope and scale of the problem.
‍

References
‍

1. https://the420.in/78415-2vellore-man-cambodia-cyber-slavery-trafficking-case/
2. https://the420.in/madhan-vadivel-cambodia-cyber-slavery-trafficking-racket-investigation/
3. https://www.newsonair.gov.in/tamil-nadu-police-arrest-key-recruiter-in-cambodia-cyber-slavery-racket/
4. https://kashmirdotcom.in/2026/05/16/cambodia-linked-human-trafficking-cyber-slavery-racket-nia-chargesheets-five-including-absconding-kingpin/
5. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/16/more-than-1000-arrested-in-cambodian-cyber-scam-raids
6. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/why-southeast-asias-online-scam-industry-is-so-hard-to-shut-down
7. https://www.cfr.org/articles/how-myanmar-became-global-center-cyber-scams
8. https://www.amlrightsource.com/resources/scam-states-the-cybercrime-corruption-complex-in-southeast-asia-and-the-collapse-of-anti-money-laundering-enforcement
9. https://newlinesinstitute.org/global-security-mil-priorities/cybercrimes-human-trafficking-and-cryptocurrency-in-southeast-asias-special-economic-zones/
10. https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2026/03/21/lured-by-jobs-sold-into-slavery-indias-crackdown-on-cyber-trafficking-continues.html

‍

In a recent ruling, a U.S. federal judge sided with Meta in a copyright lawsuit brought by a group of prominent authors who alleged that their works were illegally used to train Meta’s LLaMA language model. While this seems like a significant legal victory for the tech giant, it may not be so. Rather, this is a good case study for creators in the USA to refine their legal strategies and for policymakers worldwide to act quickly to shape the rules of engagement between AI and intellectual property.

The Case: Meta vs. Authors

In Kadrey v. Meta, the plaintiffs alleged that Meta trained its LLaMA models on pirated copies of their books, violating copyright law. However, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria ruled that the authors failed to prove two critical things: that their copyrighted works had been used in a way that harmed their market and that such use was not “transformative.” In fact, the judge ruled that converting text into numerical representations to train an AI was sufficiently transformative under the U.S. fair use doctrine. He also noted that the authors’ failure to demonstrate economic harm undermined their claims. Importantly, he clarified that this ruling does not mean that all AI training data usage is lawful, only that the plaintiffs didn’t make a strong enough case.

Meta even admitted that some data was sourced from pirate sites like LibGen, but the Judge still found that fair use could apply because the usage was transformative and non-exploitative.

A Tenuous Win

Chhabria’s decision emphasised that this is not a blanket endorsement of using copyrighted content in AI training. The judgment leaned heavily on the procedural weakness of the case and not necessarily on the inherent legality of Meta’s practices.

Policy experts are warning that U.S. courts are currently interpreting AI training as fair use in narrow cases, but the rulings may not set the strongest judicial precedent. The application of law could change with clearer evidence of commercial harm or a more direct use of content. 

Moreover, the ruling does not address whether authors or publishers should have the right to opt out of AI model training, a concern that is gaining momentum globally.

Implications for India

The case highlights a glaring gap in India’s copyright regime: it is outdated. Since most AI companies are located in the U.S., courts have had the opportunity to examine copyright in the context of AI-generated content. India has yet to start. Recently, news agency ANI filed a case alleging copyright infringement against OpenAI for training on its copyrighted material. However, the case is only at an interim stage. The final outcome of the case will have a significant impact on the legality of these language models being able to use copyrighted material for training.

Considering that India aims to develop “state-of-the-art foundational AI models trained on Indian datasets” under the IndiaAI Mission, the lack of clear legal guidance on what constitutes fair dealing when using copyrighted material for AI training is a significant gap.  

Thus, key points of consideration for policymakers include: 

• Need for Fair Dealing Clarity: India’s fair-dealing provisions under the Copyright Act, 1957, are narrower than U.S. fair use. The doctrine may have to be reviewed to strike a balance between this law and the requirement of diverse datasets to develop foundational models rooted in Indian contexts. A parallel concern regarding data privacy also arises. 
• Push for Opt-Out or Licensing Mechanisms: India should consider whether to introduce a framework that requires companies to license training data or provide an opt-out system for creators, especially given the volume of Indian content being scraped by global AI systems.
• Digital Public Infrastructure for AI: India’s policymakers could take this opportunity to invest in public datasets, especially in regional languages, that are both high quality and legally safe for AI training.
• Protecting Local Creators: India needs to ensure that its authors, filmmakers, educators and journalists are protected from having their work repurposed without compensation, since power asymmetries between Big Tech and local creators can lead to exploitation of the latter.

Conclusion

The ruling in Meta’s favour is just one win for the developer. The real questions about consent, compensation and creative control remain unanswered. Meanwhile, the lesson for India is urgent: it needs AI policies that balance innovation with creator rights and provide legal certainty and ethical safeguards as it accelerates its AI ecosystem. Further, as global tech firms race ahead, India must not remain a passive data source; it must set the terms of its digital future. This will help the country move a step closer to achieving its goal of building sovereign AI capacity and becoming a hub for digital innovation.

References

• https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/26/meta-wins-ai-copyright-lawsuit-as-us-judge-rules-against-authors 
• https://www.wired.com/story/meta-scores-victory-ai-copyright-case/ 
• https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/25/meta-llama-ai-copyright-ruling.html 
• https://www.mondaq.com/india/copyright/1348352/what-is-fair-use-of-copyright-doctrine 
• https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2113095#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20key%20pillars,models%20trained%20on%20Indian%20datasets. ‍
• https://www.ndtvprofit.com/law-and-policy/ani-vs-openai-delhi-high-court-seeks-responses-on-copyright-infringement-charges-against-chatgpt

Executive Summary

‍

A video featuring India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar is being widely circulated on social media with the claim that he urged US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US President Donald Trump to hand over the “handlers” of the so-called “Cockroach Janata Party” to India. The viral post further alleges that Jaishankar described the organisation as a “Pakistani and Iranian proxy group.” CyberPeace Research Wing research found the viral claim to be fake. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar did not make any statement regarding the “Cockroach Party” or its alleged handlers during the press conference. The viral video has been edited and is being shared with a misleading claim.

‍

Claim

‍

A verified X (formerly Twitter) user shared the viral clip and claimed that during a joint press conference, Jaishankar said:“I request Marco Rubio and Trump to hand over the handlers of the Cockroach Party because they are Pakistani and Iranian proxy groups.”

• https://x.com/insiderwb/status/2058768683070001191

‍

‍

Fact Check

‍

To verify the claim, we converted the viral clip into key frames and conducted a reverse image search. During the research, we found the original video uploaded on May 24, 2026, on the official YouTube channel of the Ministry of External Affairs.

The video was captioned:“Press conference of EAM Dr S Jaishankar and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.”

• https://www.youtube.com/live/_azsXxGflhU

‍

‍

A review of the full press conference confirmed that Jaishankar made no mention of any “Cockroach Party,” its alleged handlers, or any Pakistani or Iranian proxy network. Further verification of the official transcripts published by both the Indian Ministry of External Affairs and the United States Department of State also found no references to the terms “Cockroach Party,” “handlers,” “Pakistani proxy,” or any statements matching the viral claim.

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/05/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-and-indian-external-affairs-minister-dr-subrahmanyam-jaishankar-at-a-joint-press-availability

‍

‍

In the final stage of verification, the viral clip was analysed using an AI detection tool. The analysis suggested that the audio had been manipulated and that the video appeared to be edited. The tool indicated a 63 percent probability that the clip had been altered using AI-based editing techniques.

‍

‍

Conclusion

‍

The research confirms that the viral claim is fake. S. Jaishankar did not make any statement regarding the “Cockroach Party” or its alleged handlers during the press conference. The viral clip has been edited and is being shared with misleading claims.

‍