#FactCheck - Viral Video of US President Biden Dozing Off during Television Interview is Digitally Manipulated and Inauthentic

Introduction

Twitter is a popular social media plate form with millions of users all around the world. Twitter’s blue tick system, which verifies the identity of high-profile accounts, has been under intense scrutiny in recent years. The platform must face backlash from its users and brands who have accused it of basis, inaccuracy, and inconsistency in its verification process. This blog post will explore the questions raised on the verification process and its impact on users and big brands.

What is Twitter’s blue trick System?

The blue tick system was introduced in 2009 to help users identify the authenticity of well-known public figures, Politicians, celebrities, sportspeople, and big brands. The Twitter blue Tick system verifies the identity of high-profile accounts to display a blue badge next to your username.

According to a survey, roughly there are 294,000 verified Twitter Accounts which means they have a blue tick badge with them and have also paid the subscription for the service, which is nearly $7.99 monthly, so think about those subscribers who have paid the amount and have also lost their blue badge won’t they feel cheated?

The Controversy

Despite its initial aim, the blue tick system has received much criticism from consumers and brands. Twitter’s irregular and non-transparent verification procedure has sparked accusations of prejudice and inaccuracy. Many Twitter users have complained that the network’s verification process is random and favours account with huge followings or celebrity status. In contrast, others have criticised the platform for certifying accounts that promote harmful or controversial content.

Furthermore, the verification mechanism has generated user confusion, as many need to understand the significance of the blue tick badge. Some users have concluded that the blue tick symbol represents a Twitter endorsement or that the account is trustworthy. This confusion has resulted in users following and engaging with verified accounts that promote misleading or inaccurate data, undermining the platform’s credibility.

How did the Blue Tick Row start in India?

On 21 May 2021, when the government asked Twitter to remove the blue badge from several profiles of high-profile Indian politicians, including the Indian National Congress Party Vice-President Mr Rahul Ghandhi.

The blue badge gives the users an authenticated identity. Many celebrities, including Amitabh Bachchan, popularly known as Big B, Vir Das, Prakash Raj, Virat Kohli, and Rohit Sharma, have lost their blue tick despite being verified handles.

What is the Twitter policy on blue tick?

To Twitter’s policy, blue verification badges may be removed from accounts if the account holder violates the company’s verification policy or terms of service. In such circumstances, Twitter typically notifies the account holder of the removal of the verification badge and the reason for the removal. In the instance of the “Twitter blue badge row” in India, however, it appears that Twitter did not notify the impacted politicians or their representatives before revoking their verification badges. Twitter’s lack of communication has exacerbated the controversy around the episode, with some critics accusing the company of acting arbitrarily and not following due process.

Is there a solution?

The “Twitter blue badge row” has no simple answer since it involves a complex convergence of concerns about free expression, social media policies, and government laws. However, here are some alternatives:

• Establish clear guidelines: Twitter should develop and constantly implement clear guidelines and policies for the verification process. All users, including politicians and government officials, would benefit from greater transparency and clarity.
• Increase transparency: Twitter’s decision-making process for deleting or restoring verification badges should be more open. This could include providing explicit reasons for badge removal, notifying impacted users promptly, and offering an appeals mechanism for those who believe their credentials were removed unfairly.
• Engage in constructive dialogue: Twitter should engage in constructive dialogue with government authorities and other stakeholders to address concerns about the platform’s content moderation procedures. This could contribute to a more collaborative approach to managing online content, leading to more effective and accepted policies.
• Follow local rules and regulations: Twitter should collaborate with the Indian government to ensure it conforms to local laws and regulations while maintaining freedom of expression. This could involve adopting more precise standards for handling requests for material removal or other actions from governments and other organisations.

Conclusion

To sum up, the “Twitter blue tick row” in India has highlighted the complex challenges that Social media faces daily in handling the conflicting interests of free expression, government rules, and their own content moderation procedures. While Twitter’s decision to withdraw the blue verification badges of several prominent Indian politicians garnered anger from the government and some public members, it also raised questions about the transparency and uniformity of Twitter’s verification procedure. In order to deal with this issue, Twitter must establish clear verification procedures and norms, promote transparency in its decision-making process, participate in constructive communication with stakeholders, and adhere to local laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Indian government should collaborate with social media platforms to create more effective and acceptable laws that balance the necessity for free expression and the protection of citizens’ rights. The “Twitter blue tick row” is just one example of the complex challenges that social media platforms face in managing online content, and it emphasises the need for greater collaboration among platforms, governments, and civil society organisations to develop effective solutions that protect both free expression and citizens’ rights.

Executive Summary:

A viral picture on social media showing UK police officers bowing to a group of social media leads to debates and discussions. The investigation by CyberPeace Research team found that the image is AI generated. The viral claim is false and misleading.

Claims:

A viral image on social media depicting that UK police officers bowing to a group of Muslim people on the street.

Fact Check:

The reverse image search was conducted on the viral image. It did not lead to any credible news resource or original posts that acknowledged the authenticity of the image. In the image analysis, we have found the number of anomalies that are usually found in AI generated images such as the uniform and facial expressions of the police officers image. The other anomalies such as the shadows and reflections on the officers' uniforms did not match the lighting of the scene and the facial features of the individuals in the image appeared unnaturally smooth and lacked the detail expected in real photographs.

We then analysed the image using an AI detection tool named True Media. The tools indicated that the image was highly likely to have been generated by AI.

We also checked official UK police channels and news outlets for any records or reports of such an event. No credible sources reported or documented any instance of UK police officers bowing to a group of Muslims, further confirming that the image is not based on a real event.

Conclusion:

The viral image of UK police officers bowing to a group of Muslims is AI-generated. CyberPeace Research Team confirms that the picture was artificially created, and the viral claim is misleading and false.

• Claim: UK police officers were photographed bowing to a group of Muslims.
• Claimed on: X, Website
• Fact Check: Fake & Misleading

Introduction

The Online Lottery Scam involves a scammer reaching out through email, phone or SMS to inform you that you have won a significant amount of money in a lottery, instructing you to contact an agent at a specific phone number or email address that actually belongs to the fraudster. Once the agent is reached out to, the recipient will need to cover processing charges in order to claim the lottery reward. Upfront Paying is required in order to receive your reward. However, actual rewards come at no cost. Additionally, such defective 'offers’ often contain phishing attacks, tricking users into clicking on malicious links.  

Modus Operandi

The common lottery fraud starts with a message stating that the receiver has won a large lottery prize. These messages are frequently crafted to imitate official correspondence from reputable institutions, sweepstakes, or foreign administrations. The scammers request the receiver to give personal information like name, address, and banking details, or to make a payment for taxes, processing fees, or legal procedures. After the victim sends the money or discloses their personal details, the scammers may vanish or persist in requesting more payments for different reasons.

Tactics and Psychological Manipulation

These fraudulent techniques mostly rely on psychological manipulation to work. Fraudsters by persuading the victims create the fake sense of emergency that they must act quickly in order to get the lottery prize. Additionally, they prey on people's hopes for a better life by convincing them that this unanticipated gain has the power to change their destiny. Many people fall prey to the scam because they are driven by the desire to get wealthy and fail to recognize the warning indications. Additionally, fraudsters frequently use convincing language and fictitious documentation that appears authentic, hence users need to be extra cautious and recognise the early signs of such online fraudulent activities.

Festive Season and Uptick in Deceptive Online Scams

As the festive season begins, there is a surge in deceptive online scams that aim at targeting innocent internet users. A few examples of such scams include, free Navratri garba passes, quiz participation opportunities, coupons offering freebies, fake offers of cheap jewellery, counterfeit product sales, festival lotteries, fake lucky draws and charity appeals. Most of these scams are targeted to lure the victims for financial gain.

In 2023, CyberPeace released a research report on the Navratri festivities scam where we highlighted the ‘Tanishq iPhone 15 Gift’ scam which involved fraudsters posing as Tanishq, a well-known jewellery brand, and offering fake iPhone 15 as Navratri gifts. Victims were lured into clicking on malicious links. CyberPeace issued a detailed advisory within the report, highlighting that the public must exercise vigilance, scrutinise the legitimacy of such offers, and take precautionary measures to shield themselves from falling prey to such deceptive cyber schemes.

Preventive Measures for Lottery Scams

To avoid lottery scams ,users should avoid responding to messages or calls about fake lottery wins, verify the source of the lottery, maintain confidentiality by not sharing sensitive personal details, approach unexpected windfalls with scepticism, avoid upfront payment requests, and recognize manipulative tactics by scammers. Ignoring messages or calls about fake lottery wins is a smart move. Verifying the source and asking probing questions is also crucial. Users are also advisednot to click on such unsolicited links of lottery prizes received in emails or messages as such links can be phishing attempts. These best practices can help protect the victims against scammers who pressurise victims to act quickly that led them to fall prey to such scams.

Must-Know Tips to Prevent Lottery Scams

●     It is advised to steer clear of any communication that offers lotteries or giveaways, as these are often perceived as too good to be true.

●     It is advised to refrain from transferring money to individuals/entities who are unknown without verifying their identity and credibility.

●     If you have already given the fraudsters your bank account details, it is crucial to alert your bank immediately.

●     Report any such incidents on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal at cybercrime.gov.in or Cyber Crime Helpline Number 1930.

‍