#FactCheck - Misleading Claims Spread With Old Ram Idol Vandalism Video
Executive Summary
A video circulating on social media has sparked controversy, showing a man allegedly vandalising an idol of Lord Ram. Users sharing the clip claim that the incident recently took place in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The posts further allege that a Muslim individual climbed the idol and attempted to damage it. However, research by the CyberPeace found the viral claim to be misleading. The research revealed that the video is not recent but nearly three years old. At the time of the incident, the police had already arrested the accused. Social media users are now resharing the old video with false claims that it is a recent event.
Claim:
On February 14, 2026, a Facebook user shared the viral video claiming that the incident occurred in Ayodhya, where a large religious gathering was underway. The post alleged that a man identified as Mohammad Mukhtar Mandal climbed the idol of Lord Ram and attempted to break it. The post was widely circulated with inflammatory remarks. (Link and archived version of the post were provided along with a screenshot.)
Fact Check
To verify the authenticity of the claim, we extracted key frames from the viral video and conducted a reverse image search using Google Lens. During the search, we found a report published on January 30, 2024, on the Hindi website of Patrika, which carried visuals matching the viral footage. According to the report, a video had surfaced showing a man climbing an idol of Lord Ram in Ayodhya and attempting to damage it. The video had gone viral at the time, following which police registered a case against the accused, Mukhtar Ali Mandal, and arrested him.
Further research led us to another Facebook post featuring the same video. In the comment section of that post, Uttar Pradesh Police clarified that the incident dated back to January 2024. The Ayodhya police had registered a case against the accused shown in the video and sent him to jail.
Conclusion:
The research confirms that the viral video is not recent but an old incident from January 2024. The accused was arrested at the time. The video is being reshared with misleading claims falsely presenting it as a recent event.
Related Blogs
Introduction
In 2019 India got its bill on Data protection in the form of the Personal Data Protection Bill 2019. This bill focused on digital rights and duties pertaining to data privacy. However, the bill was scrapped by the Govt in mid-2022, and a new bill was drafted, Successor bill was introduced as the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022 on 18th November 2022, which was made open for public comments and consultations and now the bill is expected to be tabled at the parliament in the Monsoon session.
What is DPDP, 2022?
Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, is the lasted draft regulation for data privacy in India. The bill has been essentially focused towards data protection by companies and the keep aspect of Puttaswamy judgement of data privacy as a fundamental right has been upheld under the scope of the bill. The bill comes after nearly 150 recommendations which the parliamentary committee made when the PDP, 2019 was scrapped.
The bill highlights the following keen aspects-
- Data Fiduciary- The entity (an individual, company, firm, state, etc.) which decides the purpose and means of processing an individual’s personal data.
- Data Principle- The individual to whom personal data is related.
- Processing- The entire cycle of operations that can be carried out concerning personal data.
- Gender Neutrality- For the first time in India’s legislative history, “her” and “she” have been used to refer to individuals irrespective of gender.
- Right to Erase Data- Data principals will have the right to demand the erasure and correction of data collected by the data fiduciary.
- Cross-border data transfer- The bill allows cross-border data after an assessment of relevant factors by the Central Government.
- Children’s Rights- The bill guarantees the right to digital privacy under the protection of parents/guardians.
- Heavy Penalties- The bill enforces heavy penalties for non-compliance with the provisions, not exceeding Rs 500 crore.
Data Protection Board
The bill lays down provisions for setting up a Data Protection Board. This board will be an independent body acting solely on the factors of data privacy and protection of the data principles and maintaining compliance by data fiduciaries. The board will be headed by a chairperson of essential and relevant qualifications, and members and various other officials shall assist him/her under the board. The board will serve grievance redressal to the data principles and can conduct investigation, inquiry, proceeding, and pass orders equivalent to a Civil court. The proceeding will be undertaken on the principle of natural justice, and the aggrieved can file an appeal to the High Court of appropriate jurisdiction.
Global Comparison
Many countries have data protection laws that regulate the processing of personal data. Some of the notable examples include:
- European Union: The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is one of the world’s most comprehensive data protection laws. It regulates public and private entities’ processing of personal data and gives individuals a wide range of rights over their personal data.
- United States: The US has several data protection laws that apply to specific sectors or types of data, such as health data (HIPAA) or financial data (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act). However, there is no comprehensive federal data protection law in the US.
- Japan: Japan’s Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) regulates the handling of personal data by private entities and gives individuals certain rights over their personal data.
- Australia: Australia’s Privacy Act 1988 regulates the handling of personal data by public and private entities and gives individuals certain rights over their personal data.
- Brazil: Brazil’s General Data Protection Law (LGPD) regulates the processing of personal data by public and private entities and gives individuals certain rights over their personal data. It also imposes heavy fines and penalties on entities that violate the provisions of the law.
Overall, while there are some similarities in data protection laws across countries, there are also significant differences in scope, applicability, and enforcement. It is important for organisations to understand the data protection laws that apply to their operations and take appropriate steps to comply with these laws.
Parliamentary Asscent
The case of violation of the privacy policy by WhatsApp at the Hon’ble Supreme Court resulted in a significant advocacy for Data privacy as a fundamental right, and it was held that, as suggested otherwise in the privacy policy, Whatsapp was sharing its user’s data with Meta. This massive breach of trust could have led to data mismanagement affecting thousands of Indian users. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has taken due consideration of data privacy and its challenges in India and asked the Govt to table the bill in Parliament. The bill will be tabled for discussion in the monsoon session. The Supreme Court has set up a constitutional bench to check the bill’s scope, extent and applications and provide its judicial oversight. The constitution bench of Justices KM Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and CT Ravikumar has fixed the matter for hearing in August in order to enforce the potential changes and amendments in the act post the parliamentary discussion.
Conclusion
India is the world’s largest democracy, so the crucial aspects of passing laws and amendments have always been followed by the government and kept under check by the judiciary. The discussion over bills is a crucial part of the democratic process, and bills as important as Digital Personal Data Protection need to be discussed and analysed thoroughly in both houses of Parliament to ensure the govt passes a sustainable and efficient law.
Executive Summary
A disturbing video showing a girl placing soil on a grave is going viral on social media. In the video, a young girl can be seen crying as she places soil on a grave in the presence of several people. The video is being shared in connection with Bangladeshi nationals allegedly killed in Saudi Arabia. It is claimed that her parents were killed while making a reel inside a mosque in Saudi Arabia and that she is placing soil on their grave.
CyberPeace Research found that the video of the girl placing soil on a grave dates back to May 2026. In reality, a Bangladeshi national named Sajal died in Saudi Arabia after a tree fell on him while he was eating. The girl seen in the video is Sajal’s daughter. The video is now being shared with a false claim linking it to a man and a woman who were recently sentenced to death in Saudi Arabia.
Claim:
A user on X shared the video with the caption: “At the age of 6 or 7, this little girl is placing soil on the graves of both her mother and father. Their crime was that they kissed each other while making reels inside a mosque in Saudi Arabia.”
https://x.com/jpsin1/status/2112109435393024287
Fact Check
During our research, we found a photograph of the girl seen in the viral video in a report published on May 6, 2026, by another Bangladeshi news website, Bhorer Kagoj (bhorerkagoj.net). The report stated that Sajal Howlader, 31, son of Imadul Howlader, a resident of Ward No. 4 of Khanda village under Rayenda Union No. 3 in Sharankhola Upazila, died after being crushed by a tree in Saudi Arabia.
According to the report, Sajal’s father, Imadul, said that on May 2, at around 4:30 p.m. Saudi Arabia time, Sajal and five other people were sitting under a tree and eating rice when a large she-oak tree fell on them. The five other people sitting under the tree survived, but Sajal died after being crushed by it.
The report also stated that Sajal’s daughter had appealed to Bangladesh Prime Minister Tarique Rahman to bring her father’s body back from Saudi Arabia.
https://www.bhorerkagoj.net/country/786354
Upon further research, we found a detailed report about the incident published by the Bangladeshi news website Daily Ajker Songram (dailyajkersongram.com). The report stated that 31-year-old Mohammad Sajal died in Saudi Arabia after a tree fell on him.
His body arrived at Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport at around 11 a.m. on May 25, 2026. After the completion of the legal formalities, Sajal’s body reached his hometown of Sharankhola on May 26, 2026.
https://www.dailyajkersongram.com/2026/05/27/
An X account also shared the video, claiming that the original video dates back to May 27, when the girl’s father had died.
https://x.com/ab12o3/status/2112149070764482702
Conclusion
Our research found that the video showing a girl placing soil on a grave dates back to May 2026. In reality, a Bangladeshi national named Sajal died in Saudi Arabia after a tree fell on him while he was eating. The girl seen in the video is Sajal’s daughter. The video is now being shared with a false claim linking it to a man and a woman who were recently sentenced to death in Saudi Arabia.
The Emerging Landscape of AI-Enabled Sign Language Technologies
Consumer technology has been moving in a single, steady direction for decades: machines are getting increasingly sensitive to human speech. The phone transcribes what we say into it. An algorithm responds to a question we ask. With just one tap, we can translate across languages. However, sign language, one of the most essential forms of human expression, has largely escaped this change for millions of Deaf and hard-of-hearing people. At last, that omission may finally be narrowing.
For the first time, sign language recognition is now widely available in consumer goods thanks to Google DeepMind’s massively multilingual sign language-to-text model. Starting with American Sign Language to English, the technology currently powers sign-to-text dictation within Gboard and Live Transcribe on Pixel 11. Additional devices and languages are promised. In addition to using Live Transcribe to sign during live conversations, users can sign anywhere they would normally type, such as while conducting a web search, writing a message or interacting with an AI assistant. However, this development’s importance goes far beyond a single accessibility function.
Reimagining How We connect with Technology
The most noteworthy is a conceptual change, sign language is starting to be recognised as a valid interface for human-computer interaction in and of itself , rather than as a modality that technology can accept. Because sign languages are not spoken languages that are represented by hand, this distinction is important. The hands, arms, torso, head and facial expressions all simultaneously convey meaning in these independent natural languages, which have their own grammar, vocabulary and syntax. Compared to traditional voice recognition, this presents a far more complex computing task.
In terms of architecture, the model does not keep raw video instead, it processes pose landmark sequences. The original footage may be destroyed while an on-device mechanism tracks locations on the signer’s body and transmits only geometric coordinates for translation. Instead than using intermediate “gloss” representations, which sometimes lose the spatial and non-manual components crucial to meaning, translation happens directly. Accessibility and privacy meet at this point, a technology designed to grant independence shouldn’t require the surrender of personal biometric information in return.
The Indian question is larger than ASL
A more significant concern for India is raised by this development, whose sign language will artificial intelligence eventually comprehend? It is not possible to import an ASL-to-English model and claim it to be a solution. The linguistic architecture, communities and regional variations of Indian Sign Language are unique. ISL recognition and its translation into Hindi, Telugu and Bengali are the subject of an expanding amount of study yet this same research openly highlights the shortcomings of existing systems including limited vocabularies, isolated word recognition and noticeable sensitivity to individual signing style.
This is not a coincidental distinction. Benchmark accuracy alone cannot be used to gauge inclusive AI; instead, it must be effective under typical circumstances for a variety of individuals, geographical locations and sign languages. It is clear from research on low resource sign languages that over three hundred sign languages are still woefully under-resourced and under-documented. A growing body of research supports signer-adaptive modelling, privacy preserving representations, community co-design and dialectical variety preservation. Therefore, making data collecting, engagement and design more truly inclusive may be the next real advancement rather than further scaling models.
A Legal Architecture already in place
India’s statutory framework offers a firm foundation for this trajectory. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 defines universal design broadly enough to include cutting edge technologies and assistive devices. It is based on the ideals of equality, dignity, participation and accessibility. Information and communication technology access is specifically covered by Section 42, which requires captioning, sign language interpretation, accessible electronic content and universal design in common electronic products. In this context, accessible AI is an issue of statutory rights rather than technological generosity. This stance is supported by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which addresses accessibility in Article 9 and information access and freedom of speech in Article 21. As a result, the central policy topic is changing from whether technology should be made accessible to how accessibility should be incorporated from the start.
Beyond sign-to-text
Beyond Transcription, Google has expressed aspirations for more sign languages, sign language production and expanded AI capabilities. Future architecture could be imagined as running along a continuous circuit that connects sign, text, speech and AI in both directions rather than just from sign to text. A consumer could deal with a bank without completely relying on an interpreter; a student could learn in her favourite language; or someone could sign a question to an assistant and could get an answer in generated sign language. However , there are still important unanswered questions about this future, such as who owns the data used to train these systems, how signers’ meaningful consent is obtained, how systematic misrecognition of specific communities is prevented and who is responsible when translation fails in an emergency, legal or medical setting.
The Real Measure of Inclusion
The mere fact that a machine has discovered something humans have long understood makes it easy to characterise innovations like these as breakthroughs. The most accurate way to put it is that technology becomes inclusive when individuals can use it without changing who they are or how they interact, not when it acknowledges more human behaviours. This means that India must continue to invest not only in models but also in Indian Sign Language databases, community-led research, accessibility standards and the meaningful involvement of the Deaf and hard-of-hearing populations in both design and evaluation. The ability of a system to detect a hand gesture will not define the future of accessible AI.
References
- https://aclanthology.org/2025.wslp-main.5/
- The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 (Act No 49 of 2016), s 42.
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (adopted 13 December 2006, entered into force 3 May 2008) 2515 UNTS 3, art 9.
