#FactCheck - Edited Video of ‘India-India’ Chants at Republican National Convention
Executive Summary:
A video online alleges that people are chanting "India India" as Ohio Senator J.D. Vance meets them at the Republican National Convention (RNC). This claim is not correct. The CyberPeace Research team’s investigation showed that the video was digitally changed to include the chanting. The unaltered video was shared by “The Wall Street Journal” and confirmed via the YouTube channel of “Forbes Breaking News”, which features different music performing while Mr. and Mrs. Usha Vance greeted those present in the gathering. So the claim that participants chanted "India India" is not real.
Claims:
A video spreading on social media shows attendees chanting "India-India" as Ohio Senator J.D. Vance and his wife, Usha Vance greet them at the Republican National Convention (RNC).
Fact Check:
Upon receiving the posts, we did keyword search related to the context of the viral video. We found a video uploaded by The Wall Street Journal on July 16, titled "Watch: J.D. Vance Is Nominated as Vice Presidential Nominee at the RNC," at the time stamp 0:49. We couldn’t hear any India-India chants whereas in the viral video, we can clearly hear it.
We also found the video on the YouTube channel of Forbes Breaking News. In the timestamp at 3:00:58, we can see the same clip as the viral video but no “India-India” chant could be heard.
Hence, the claim made in the viral video is false and misleading.
Conclusion:
The viral video claiming to show "India-India" chants during Ohio Senator J.D. Vance's greeting at the Republican National Convention is altered. The original video, confirmed by sources including “The Wall Street Journal” and “Forbes Breaking News” features different music without any such chants. Therefore, the claim is false and misleading.
Claim: A video spreading on social media shows attendees chanting "India-India" as Ohio Senator J.D. Vance and his wife, Usha Vance greet them at the Republican National Convention (RNC).
Claimed on: X
Fact Check: Fake & Misleading
Related Blogs
Executive Summary
Last September, protests were held in Ladakh over several demands, including full statehood, extension of Sixth Schedule protections, separate Lok Sabha seats for Leh and Kargil, and reservation in jobs. During that period, some demonstrations turned violent. Since then, talks between stakeholders and the government have continued regarding these demands. Amid this backdrop, Pakistani propaganda handles on social media are sharing a video of a protest and claiming that violent demonstrations have erupted in Ladakh following the arrest of education reformer Sonam Wangchuk. CyberPeace Research Wing research found the claim to be misleading. The claim regarding Sonam Wangchuk’s arrest is false, while the viral video is actually from protests that took place in September last year.
Claim:
Sharing the video, a user wrote: “Massive protests in Ladakh. Violent demonstrations have erupted after reports of the arrest of Ladakh’s revolutionary leader Sonam Wangchuk. The people of Ladakh seek justice and freedom from the Indian Army, which is attacking civilians.”
https://x.com/ZardSi/status/2064204063248695393?s=20
Fact Check:
Our research found the claim to be misleading. The viral video is from protests held in September last year, and the claim that Sonam Wangchuk has been arrested is also false. We first converted the video into keyframes and conducted a reverse image search using Google Lens. This led us to several videos and news reports covering the same incident. The viral footage was found in a news report uploaded on September 24, 2025, by Asianet News English on YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/@asianetnewsenglish
According to the information provided with the video, large-scale protests took place in Leh in support of demands for Sixth Schedule status and full statehood for Ladakh. The movement turned violent following clashes with police, and protesters allegedly set fire to a BJP office in Leh. CRPF personnel and local police later detained several protesters, bringing the situation under control. We also found a report published by Arunachal24, which stated that at least four people were killed and more than 70 injured in violent clashes between protesters demanding statehood and constitutional safeguards for Ladakh and security forces. The report further mentioned that protesters set fire to a local BJP office and a CRPF vehicle, following which authorities imposed a strict curfew across Leh.
Our team also found that the claim about Sonam Wangchuk’s arrest is entirely false. Wangchuk remains active on social media and had posted an update on June 10, indicating that he had not been detained.
Conclusion:
The fact-check clearly shows that the viral claim is misleading. There is no evidence that Sonam Wangchuk has been arrested. The viral video is not recent and actually shows protests that took place in Ladakh in September 2025.
Introduction
Microchips are the invisible foundation of the modern economy. From consumer electronics and automotive manufacturing to military defense and artificial intelligence, virtually every critical industry relies on semiconductor supply chains. Yet, despite their ubiquity, chip manufacturing remains one of the most complex and concentrated supply networks on the planet. This explainer breaks down the global semiconductor ecosystem: how chips are produced, where the primary vulnerabilities lie, and why control over silicon has become the defining geopolitical battleground of our time.
A Chip Crosses More Borders Than Most People Do
Chipmaking is a relay race across continents. Engineers design the layout, then factories carve it onto silicon wafers so precisely that a particle of dust can ruin a batch. A single chip may be designed in the United States, made in Taiwan on Dutch equipment, assembled in Malaysia or Vietnam, and soldered in China or India. Thus, the entire link in the chain is vulnerable, and the failure of one weak element will lead to the stoppage of the entire chain. The forecast for the industry in 2021 was complicated by pandemic-related constraints and record demand, resulting in the disruption of automakers’ production costs by $210 billion and the loss of 7.7 million vehicles, according to AlixPartners
The Geography of Silicon Power
Manufacturing clusters in East Asia: Taiwan is focused on advanced manufacturing, South Korea – on memory (Samsung, SK Hynix), Japan – on chemicals and equipment. South Korea is ready to double its DRAM production in 2026 by increasing it 5 times than 2025. China is seeking to reduce its dependence on imports, but it is not as far along in advanced manufacturing as many analysts believe. The US holds much of the underlying IP but manufactures a smaller share of it — TSMC's Arizona campus shows the shift, growing from $12 billion to over $165 billion, with a further $100 billion expansion announced in mid-2026 that could push the total to $265 billion, potentially the largest foreign direct investment in US history.
Foundry, Fabless, or Both?
The semiconductor industry runs on three primary business models:
- Fabless (Design-Only): Companies like NVIDIA, AMD, and Qualcomm focus exclusively on architecture, intellectual property, and circuit design. They outsource all physical fabrication to specialised manufacturers, which helps them stay agile.
- Pure-Play Foundries (Manufacturing-Only): Dedicated contract manufacturers, most prominently TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company), take designs from fabless firms and produce the physical wafers. They invest billions annually in advanced lithography and don’t compete in product design.
- Integrated Device Manufacturers (IDMs): Legacy companies like Intel and Samsung manage the entire lifecycle, from designing and fabricating to packaging their own chips. However, maintaining both cutting-edge design and manufacturing capabilities has become more and more difficult, leading IDMs to adopt hybrid foundry strategies.
Advanced Packaging: The New Frontier
For decades, the primary driver of semiconductor performance was Moore’s Law: shrinking transistor dimensions on a single silicon die. But physical limitations are making traditional scaling prohibitively expensive, making the industry shift its focus to Advanced Packaging. Techniques like 2.5D and 3D stacking combine multiple chips with short, dense wiring, boosting speed and efficiency without shrinking transistors, which are crucial for AI hardware. TSMC's CoWoS platform is now considered as critical as fabrication itself, with demand regularly outpacing supply. Because packaging needs far less capital than a leading-edge fab, more countries are racing to build local packaging capacity.
Who Actually Runs This Industry
A few companies dominate the market. TSMC is the biggest contract manufacturer of chips, while Samsung is both a designer and a manufacturer. Intel is re-establishing its foundry business, while Nvidia has taken over the market for AI and graphics processing units. Qualcomm and MediaTek dominate the market for mobile phone chips, and AMD competes in the personal computer market. Finally, there is one tiny Dutch company, ASML, which has a monopoly on the most advanced lithography tools, called extreme ultraviolet, or EUV. Each such machine costs more than $15 billion, so there is no real competition for now. Broadcom, Micron, and SK Hynix are other important players, as they are major suppliers of memory chips for computers and cars, as well as AI chips.
Where Things Are Headed
AI remains central, pushing advanced packaging and high-bandwidth memory to the top of every strategy; SEMI projects 300mm memory equipment investment will exceed $50 billion in 2026. Trade policy now matters as much as technology. In January 2026, the U.S. imposed a 25 per cent tariff on advanced semiconductors and began applying case-by-case reviews to previously near-automatic rejections of requests for Chinese firms to buy state-of-the-art chips for use in artificial intelligence computers. The U.S. is incentivizing Taiwanese manufacturers to make semiconductors in America while South Korea, Japan, and the European Union have made efforts to encourage investment in their own display technology. According to an article from Bloomberg published in July 2026, new fabrication plants face a danger of being delayed for years due to a shortage of skilled workers, resulting in billions of dollars wasted on investments.
Conclusion
Ultimately, semiconductors represent the ultimate convergence of technology, commerce, and geopolitics. A single speck of silicon now carries the weight of global GDP, national security, and the future of artificial intelligence. As trade barriers rise and supply chains re-align, control over these micro-foundations will decide which economies lead and which get left behind. The next decade will be won by mastering advanced packaging, talent management, and forging strategic alliances.
References
AlixPartners. "Semiconductor Shortages to Cost the Auto Industry Billions." September 2021
TSMC. "TSMC Arizona." Company overview
World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS). "Global Semiconductor Market Surges Beyond $1.5T 2026."
Introduction
Law grows by confronting its absences, it heals through its own gaps. States often find themselves navigating a shared frontier without a mutual guide or lines of law in an era of expanding digital boundaries and growing cyber damages. The United Nations General Assembly ratified the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime on December 24, 2024, and more than sixty governments were in attendance in the signing ceremony on 24th & 25th October this year, marking a moment of institutional regeneration and global commitment.
A new Lexicon for Global Order
The old liberal order is being strained by growing nationalism, economic fracturing, populism, and great-power competition as often emphasised in the works of scholars like G. John Iken berry and John Mearsheimer. Multilateral arrangements become more brittle in such circumstances. Therefore, the new cybercrimes convention represents not only a legal tool but also a resurgence of international promise, a significant win for collective governance in an uncertain time. It serves as a reminder that institutions can be rebuilt even after they have been damaged.
In Discussion: The Fabric of the Digital Polis
The digital sphere has become a contentious area. On the one hand, the US and its allies support stakeholder governance, robust individual rights, and open data flows. On the other hand, nations like China and Russia describe a “post-liberal cyber order” based on state mediation, heavily regulated flows, and sovereignty. Instead of focusing on ideological dichotomies, India, which is positioned as both a rising power and a voice of the Global South, has offered a viewpoint based on supply-chain security, data localisation, and capacity creation. Thus, rather than being merely a regulation, the treaty arises from a framework of strategic recalibration.
What Changed & Why it Matters
There have been regional cybercrime accords up to this point, such as the Budapest Convention. The goal of this new international convention, which is accessible to all UN members, is to standardise definitions, evidence sharing and investigation instruments. 72 states signed the Hanoi signature event in October, 2025, demonstrating an unparalleled level of scope and determination. In addition to establishing structures for cooperative investigations, extradition, and the sharing of electronic evidence, it requires signatories to criminalise acts such as fraud, unlawful access to systems, data interference, and online child exploitation.
For the first time, a legally obligatory global architecture aims to harmonise cross-border evidence flows, mutual legal assistance, and national procedural laws. Cybercrime offers genuine promise for community defence at a time when it is no longer incidental but existential, attacks on hospitals, schools and infrastructure are now common, according to the Global Observatory.
Holding the Line: India’s Deliberate Path in the Age of Cyber Multilateralism
India takes a contemplative rather than a reluctant stance towards the UN Cybercrime Treaty. Though it played an active role during the drafting sessions and lent its voice to the shaping of global cyber norms, New Delhi is yet to sign the convention. Subtle but intentional, the reluctance suggests a more comprehensive reflection, an evaluation of how international obligations correspond with domestic constitutional protections, especially the right to privacy upheld by the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy v. UOI (2017).
Prudence is the reason for this halt. Policy circles speculate that the government is still assessing the treaty’s consequences for national data protection, surveillance regimes, and territorial sovereignty. Officials have not provided explicit justifications for India’s refusal to join. India’s position has frequently been characterised by striking a careful balance between digital sovereignty and taking part in cooperative international regimes. In earlier negotiations, India had even proposed including clauses to penalise “offensive messages” on social media, echoing the erstwhile Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000, but the suggestion found little international traction.
Advocates for digital rights such as Raman Jit Singh Chima of Access Now have warned that ensuring that the treaty’s implementation upholds constitutional privacy principles may be necessary for India to eventually endorse it. He contends that the treaty’s wording might not entirely meet India’s legal requirements in the absence of such voluntary pledges.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres praised the agreement as “a powerful, legally binding instrument to strengthen our collective defences against “cybercrime” during its signing in Hanoi. The issue for India is to make sure that multilateral collaboration develops in accordance with constitutional values rather than to reject that vision. Therefore, the path forward is one of assertion rather than absence, careful march towards a cyber future that protects freedom and sovereignty.
