#FactCheck: AI Video made by Pakistan which says they launched a cross-border airstrike on India's Udhampur Airbase

Tech News overview

Recently, the TRAI has passed some recommendations that benefit the telecommunications industry in India. The suggestion is to lower the entry fees and bank guarantees on the 26th of July 20, 2022. Then wrote a few consulting papers, countering comments by the stakeholders of various companies. 

In a significant move, TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) has proposed spacious changes in terms of entry fees and bank guarantees in the telecom sector. These endorsements have been abeyant to escort the new era of competition, investment, and innovation, reshaping India’s telecommunication landscape.

Proposal Points by TRAI to telecom companies:

As we dive into considering the recommendations by TRAI  into the crucial aspects of the telecom industry, deliberate about the significance of entry fees, the importance of banks, and the guarantees.

1. Entry fees: Entry fees are the advance key point that upholds the charges that telecom companies pay to the government when they want to offer services to the civilians of the country. The amount they pay is quite hefty and usually non-refundable.
2. Bank guarantee: An important factor that is also a type of security, the financial security that assures the telecom companies to fulfil their financial obligations and follow the regulations and policy conditions specified in their license agreement.
3. TRAI roleplay: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India is an authority responsible for supervising the telecom industry in the country. Making sure that the regulations and recommendations such as entry fees and bank guarantees are working in the proper way or not, a supervision of such things. 
4. Expected outcomes: TRAI focuses on reducing the entry fees for various types of licenses in the other telecom sector. This step encourages other new telecom operators to enter the market and increase the fair price and investment, which leads to enhancing the competition.
5. Consolidating Bank guarantees: TRAI also proposed an amalgamation of bank guarantees, which means telecom companies are required to maintain separate guarantees for different business licenses, which makes business doing sectors an easy environment.
6. No entry fee at the time of License Renewal: Recommendations by TRAI by not charging any entry fees when telecom operators renew their licenses. This step can reduce the financial burden on both existing and new entrants,, specifically for UL(VNO)license shareholders.

Reshaping the telecom panorama:

Recommendation by TRAI that can potentially help in reshaping the Telecoms landscape in India in various aspects:

• Increment in healthy Competition: By reducing the entry fees, TRAI would be creating a platform profitable and affordable for new market players in India.
• Market enlargement: Lowering the entry fees might lead to the participation of new entrants, including regional and smaller players,, to get involved in the telecom industry. 
• Due to the market expansion, the outcomes can potentially lead to improved access to telecom services in underdeveloped areas and regions and contribute to digital inclusion.
• Job Recruitment: The evolution in the telecom industry due to new operators and increased investment can lead to job uplift in both telecom and industries related to technological infrastructure.
• Choice of preference: As there is a rise in competition, consumers are likely to have many choices when it comes to telecom service providers. The consumers get to select from a wider range of services, leading to better value for money and quality of service.
• Quality of service: With increased competition and a hefty amount of investment, telecom operators have a spur to enhance the quality of service.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, TRAIs proposal on lowering the entry fees and bank guarantee for financial services marks a significant milestone in India’s telecom industry. These essential changes hold the promise of fostering competition, investment, a platform for new entrants, quality of service, wider range of platforms for selection. As these advance suggestions take place, in telecom industry in India is on a new threshold of an existing transformation that could reevaluate the way we communicate and connect.

Reference:

https://www.gearrice.com/update/telecom-companies-will-get-a-sigh-of-relief-on-trais-recommendation-to-the-government-on-entry-fees-and-bank-guarantee/

‍

Introduction

‍
In today’s digital era, warfare is being redefined. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh recently stated that “we are in the age of Grey Zone and hybrid warfare where cyber-attacks, disinformation campaigns and economic warfare have become tools to achieve politico-military aims without a single shot being fired.” The crippling cyberattacks on Estonia in 2007, Russia’s interference in the 2016 US elections, and the ransomware strike on the Colonial Pipeline in the United States in 2021 all demonstrate how states are now using cyberspace to achieve strategic goals while carefully circumventing the threshold of open war.

Legal Complexities: Attribution, Response, and Accountability

‍

Grey zone warfare challenges the traditional notions of security and international conventions on peace due to inherent challenges such as :

• Attribution
  The first challenge in cyber warfare is determining who is responsible. Threat actors hide behind rented botnets, fake IP addresses, and servers scattered across the globe. Investigators can follow digital trails, but those trails often point to machines, not people. That makes attribution more of an educated guess than a certainty. A wrong guess could lead to misattribution of blame, which could beget a diplomatic crisis, or worse, a military one.
• Proportional Response
  Even if attribution is clear, designing a response can be a challenge. International law does give room for countermeasures if they are both ‘necessary’ and ‘proportionate’. But defining these qualifiers can be a long-drawn, contested process. Effectively, governments employ softer measures such as protests or sanctions, tighten their cyber defences or, in extreme cases, strike back digitally.
• Accountability
  States can be held responsible for waging cyber attacks under the UN’s Draft Articles on State Responsibility. But these are non-binding and enforcement depends on collective pressure, which can be slow and inconsistent. In cyberspace, accountability often ends up being more symbolic than real, leaving plenty of room for repeat offences.

International and Indian Legal Frameworks

‍

Cyber law is a step behind cyber warfare since existing international frameworks are often inadequate. For example, the Tallinn Manual 2.0, the closest thing we have to a rulebook for cyber conflict, is just a set of guidelines. It says that if a cyber operation can be tied to a state, even through hired hackers or proxies, then that state can be held responsible. But attribution is a major challenge. Similarly, the United Nations has tried to build order through its Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) that promotes norms like “don’t attack. However, these norms are not binding, effectively leaving practice to diplomacy and trust.

India is susceptible to routine attacks from hostile actors, but does not yet have a dedicated cyber warfare law.  While Section 66F of the IT ACT, 2000, talks about cyber terrorism, and Section 75 lets Indian courts examine crimes committed abroad if they impact India,  grey-zone tactics like fake news campaigns, election meddling, and influence operations fall into a legal vacuum.

Way Forward

‍

• Strengthen International Cooperation
  Frameworks like the Tallinn Manual 2.0 can form the basis for future treaties. Bilateral and multilateral agreements between countries are essential to ensure accountability and cooperation in tackling grey zone activities.
• Develop Grey Zone Legislation
  India currently relies on the IT Act, 2000, but this law needs expansion to specifically cover grey zone tactics such as election interference, propaganda, and large-scale disinformation campaigns.
• Establish Active Monitoring Systems
  India must create robust early detection systems to identify grey zone operations in cyberspace. Agencies can coordinate with social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), and YouTube, which are often exploited for propaganda and disinformation, to improve monitoring frameworks.
• Dedicated Theatre Commands for Cyber Operations
  Along with the existing Defence Cyber Agency, India should consider specialised theatre commands for grey zone and cyber warfare. This would optimise resources, enhance coordination, and ensure unified command in dealing with hybrid threats.

Conclusion

‍

Grey zone warfare in cyberspace is no longer an optional tactic used by threat actors but a routine activity. India lacks the early detection systems, robust infrastructure, and strong cyber laws to counter grey-zone warfare. To counter this, India needs sharper attribution tools for early detection and must actively push for stronger international rules in this global landscape. More importantly, instead of merely blaming without clear plans, India should focus on preparing for solid retaliation strategies. By doing so, India can also learn to use cyberspace strategically to achieve politico-military aims without firing a single shot.

References

‍

• Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Michael N. Schmitt)
• UN Document on International Law in Cyberspace (UN Digital Library)
• NATO Cyber Defence Policy
• Texas Law Review: State Responsibility and Attribution of Cyber Intrusions
• Deccan Herald: Defence Minister on Grey Zone Warfare
• VisionIAS: Grey Zone Warfare
• Sachin Tiwari, The Reality of Cyber Operations in the Grey Zone

‍

Introduction 

Over the past few years, the virtual space has been an irreplaceable livelihood platform for content creators and influencers, particularly on major social media platforms like YouTube and Instagram. Yet, if this growth in digital entrepreneurship is accompanied by anything, it is a worrying trend, a steep surge in account takeover (ATO) attacks against these actors. In recent years, cybercriminals have stepped up the quantity and level of sophistication of such attacks, hacking into accounts, jeopardising the follower base, and incurring economic and reputational damage. They don’t just take over accounts to cause disruption. Instead, they use these hijacked accounts to run scams like fake livestreams and cryptocurrency fraud, spreading them by pretending to be the original account owner. This type of cybercrime is no longer a nuisance; it now poses a serious threat to the creator economy, digital trust, and the wider social media ecosystem.

Why Are Content Creators Prime Targets? 

Content creators hold a special place on the web. They are prominent users who live for visibility, public confidence, and ongoing interaction with their followers. Their social media footprint tends to extend across several interrelated platforms, e.g., YouTube, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), with many of these accounts having similar login credentials or being managed from the same email accounts. This interconnectivity of their online presence crosses multiple platforms and benefits workflow, but makes them appealing targets for hackers. One entry point can give access to a whole chain of vulnerabilities. Attackers, once they control an account, can wield its influence and reach to share scams, lead followers to phishing sites, or spread malware, all from the cover of a trusted name.

Popular Tactics Used by Attackers

• Malicious Livestream Takeovers and Rebranding - Cybercriminals hijack high-subscriber channels and rebrand them to mimic official channels. Original videos are hidden or deleted, replaced with scammy streams using deep fake personas to promote crypto schemes.
• Fake Sponsorship Offers - Creators receive emails from supposed sponsors that contain malware-infected attachments or malicious download links, leading to credential theft.
• Malvertising Campaigns - These involve fake ads on social platforms promoting exclusive software like AI tools or unreleased games. Victims download malware that searches for stored login credentials.
• Phishing and Social Engineering on Instagram - Hackers impersonate Meta support teams via DMs and emails. They direct creators to login pages that are cloned versions of Instagram's site. Others pose as fans to request phone numbers and trick victims into revealing password reset codes.
• Timely Exploits and Event Hijacking - During major public or official events, attackers often escalate their activity. Hijacked accounts are used to promote fake giveaways or exclusive live streams, luring users to malicious websites designed to steal personal information or financial data.

Real-World Impact and Case Examples

The reach and potency of account takeover attacks upon content creators are far-reaching and profound. In a report presented in 2024 by Bitdefender, over 9,000 malicious live streams were seen on YouTube during a year, with many having been streamed from hijacked creator accounts and reassigned to advertise scams and fake content. Perhaps the most high-profile incident was a channel with more than 28 million subscribers and 12.4 billion total views, which was totally taken over and utilised for a crypto fraud scheme live streaming. Additionally, Bitdefender research indicated that over 350 scam domains were utilised by cybercriminals, directly connected via hijacked social media accounts, to entice followers into phishing scams and bogus investment opportunities. Many of these pieces of content included AI-created deep fakes impersonating recognisable personalities like Elon Musk and other public figures, providing the illusion of authenticity around fake endorsements (CCN, 2024). Further, attackers have exploited popular digital events such as esports events, such as Counter-Strike 2 (CS2), by hijacking YouTube gaming channels and livestreaming false giveaways or referring viewers to imitated betting sites.

Protective Measures for Creators

• Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) 

Adds an essential layer of defence. Even if a password is compromised, attackers can't log in without the second factor. Prefer app-based or hardware token authentication.

• Scrutinize Sponsorships 

Verify sender domains and avoid opening suspicious attachments. Use sandbox environments to test files. In case of doubt, verify collaboration opportunities through official company sources or verified contacts.

• Monitor Account Activity 

Keep tabs on login history, new uploads, and connected apps. Configure alerts for suspicious login attempts or spikes in activity to detect breaches early. Configure alerts for suspicious login attempts or spikes in activity to detect breaches early.

• Educate Your Team 

If your account is managed by editors or third parties, train them on common phishing and malware tactics.  Employ regular refresher sessions and send mock phishing tests to reinforce awareness.

• Use Purpose-Built Security Tools 

Specialised security solutions offer features like account monitoring, scam detection, guided recovery, and protection for team members. These tools can also help identify suspicious activity early and support a quick response to potential threats.

Conclusion 

Account takeover attacks are no longer random events, they're systemic risks that compromise the financial well-being and personal safety of creators all over the world. As cybercriminals grow increasingly sophisticated and realistic in their scams, the only solution is a security-first approach. This encompasses a mix of technical controls, platform-level collaboration, education, and investment in creator-centric cybersecurity technologies. In today's fast-paced digital landscape, creators not only need to think about content but also about defending their digital identity. As digital platforms continue to grow, so do the threats targeting creators. However, with the right awareness, tools, and safeguards in place, a secure and thriving digital environment for creators is entirely achievable.

References

• https://www.bitdefender.com/en-au/blog/hotforsecurity/account-takeover-attacks-on-social-media-a-rising-threat-for-content-creators-and-influencers
• https://www.arkoselabs.com/account-takeover/social-media-account-takeover/
• https://www.imperva.com/learn/application-security/account-takeover-ato/
• https://www.security.org/digital-safety/account-takeover-annual-report/
• https://www.niceactimize.com/glossary/account-takeover/

‍