#FactCheck - Edited Video Falsely Claims as an attack on PM Netanyahu in the Israeli Senate
Executive Summary:
A viral online video claims of an attack on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Israeli Senate. However, the CyberPeace Research Team has confirmed that the video is fake, created using video editing tools to manipulate the true essence of the original footage by merging two very different videos as one and making false claims. The original footage has no connection to an attack on Mr. Netanyahu. The claim that endorses the same is therefore false and misleading.
Claims:
A viral video claims an attack on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Israeli Senate.
Fact Check:
Upon receiving the viral posts, we conducted a Reverse Image search on the keyframes of the video. The search led us to various legitimate sources featuring an attack on an ethnic Turkish leader of Bulgaria but not on the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, none of which included any attacks on him.
We used AI detection tools, such as TrueMedia.org, to analyze the video. The analysis confirmed with 68.0% confidence that the video was an editing. The tools identified "substantial evidence of manipulation," particularly in the change of graphics quality of the footage and the breakage of the flow in footage with the change in overall background environment.
Additionally, an extensive review of official statements from the Knesset revealed no mention of any such incident taking place. No credible reports were found linking the Israeli PM to the same, further confirming the video’s inauthenticity.
Conclusion:
The viral video claiming of an attack on Prime Minister Netanyahu is an old video that has been edited. The research using various AI detection tools confirms that the video is manipulated using edited footage. Additionally, there is no information in any official sources. Thus, the CyberPeace Research Team confirms that the video was manipulated using video editing technology, making the claim false and misleading.
- Claim: Attack on the Prime Minister Netanyahu Israeli Senate
- Claimed on: Facebook, Instagram and X(Formerly Twitter)
- Fact Check: False & Misleading
Related Blogs
Executive Summary
Amid reports that AIIMS Delhi has initiated the process to implement the Supreme Court’s decision allowing passive euthanasia for Harish Rana, a video is being shared on social media claiming to show his emotional farewell. However, research by the CyberPeace found the viral claim to be misleading. Our research revealed that the video has no connection to the Harish Rana case. In reality, the footage is from Surat, Gujarat, where the family of a 45-year-old brain-dead woman donated her organs.
Claim:
On social media platform X (formerly Twitter), a user shared the viral video on March 16, 2026, with the caption:
“Harish Rana… struggled for life for 13 years… in the end said goodbye to the world through euthanasia… but even while leaving, gave new life to many through organ donation… eyes, liver, kidneys and several other organs will give a new life to many…”
Post link and archive link are given below:
Fact Check
We took screenshots from the viral video and conducted a reverse image search. This led us to an Instagram handle where the same video was uploaded on January 27, 2026.
- https://www.instagram.com/reels/DUAt_42k2ME/
According to the caption on the Instagram post, the video shows a brain-dead woman in Surat whose liver, both kidneys, and eyes were donated. The post also included an image of the woman. Based on clues from the viral video, we conducted a keyword search on Google and found a report on the website of News18 Gujarati.
According to the report, organ donation by Ritaben Hareshbhai Korat in Surat gave a new life to five patients. The report also carried her photograph, matching the visuals seen in the viral video.
Conclusion:
Our research found that the viral video has no connection to Harish Rana. It actually shows an incident from Surat, Gujarat, where the family of a 45-year-old brain-dead woman, Ritaben Korat, donated her organs.
Introduction
Imagine receiving a WhatsApp message from your CEO late on a Friday afternoon. The message is urgent: a confidential business deal requires an immediate wire transfer before markets close. The profile picture matches, the tone sounds familiar, and the account it came from has your CEO's name on it. Everything appears legitimate except it is not. This is the essence of the 'Boss Scam,' a sophisticated form of CEO impersonation fraud that has emerged as one of the most financially devastating cybercrime trends of 2025. India's Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), under the Ministry of Home Affairs, issued an urgent national advisory on this threat in June 2025, warning that organisations across the country are falling victim to an evolved and technically advanced version of executive impersonation fraud that bypasses many traditional cybersecurity safeguards.
Understanding the Boss Scam
What Is CEO Impersonation Fraud?
CEO fraud, also known as Business Email Compromise (BEC) or executive impersonation fraud, is a targeted cyberattack in which criminals assume the digital identity of a high-ranking executive most commonly the Chief Executive Officer to deceive subordinate employees into authorising fraudulent financial transactions or divulging sensitive information. Unlike generic phishing campaigns that cast a wide net, CEO fraud is a precision attack. Cybercriminals invest significant time and resources researching their targets, studying organisational hierarchies, communication styles, and internal financial workflows before executing the scam. The attack is devastatingly effective because it weaponises one of the most powerful forces in any workplace: authority. An instruction that appears to originate from the CEO carries an implicit demand for immediate compliance, often bypassing normal checks and verification procedures. The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) has consistently identified BEC as one of the most financially destructive categories of cybercrime, with adjusted losses of approximately USD 2.77 billion reported in 2024 alone across the United States.
The New and Evolved Variant: India's I4C Advisory
The variant identified by India's I4C represents a dangerous evolution of traditional CEO fraud. The earlier versions of this scam relied on spoofed email addresses or fake WhatsApp profiles that merely mimicked an executive's account. Employees were trained to spot tell-tale warning signs suspicious domains, unusual sender addresses, or spelling errors in email IDs. The latest
Boss Scam variant eliminates many of these red flags entirely by hijacking the executive's actual and legitimate WhatsApp account. This sophisticated attack begins not with the employee, but with the CEO. Cybercriminals approach senior executives through email or WhatsApp while posing as regulatory authorities in India's context, this includes impersonating officials from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) or other government bodies. These messages claim an urgent compliance violation or regulatory breach requiring immediate remedial action. The communication contains a compressed ZIP archive, which the executive is prompted to open. Inside the archive are malicious executable (.exe) and Dynamic Link Library (.dll) files that, when run on a Windows system, deploy a Trojan dropper a form of malware capable of establishing persistent access on the device and hijacking active WhatsApp Web session tokens.
Once the session token is compromised, the attacker gains complete control over the executive's WhatsApp account without needing the phone, password, or any two-factor authentication code. The legitimate account is now in criminal hands, and any message sent from it appears entirely authentic to recipients.
How the Boss Scam Operates: A Step-by-Step Breakdown
Stage 1: Targeting the Executive: The operation begins with careful reconnaissance. Attackers study the target organisation's leadership, identify the CEO or a senior executive, and gather publicly available information about their communication patterns, business relationships, and company operations through LinkedIn, corporate websites, and news sources. They then contact the executive under a false regulatory identity, engineering a sense of crisis and urgency.
Stage 2: Malware Deployment:The fraudulent regulatory communication contains a ZIP file disguised as a compliance document, a security patch, or a mandatory software update. Upon execution on a Windows machine, the embedded malware installs itself and begins hijacking the WhatsApp Web session. Critically, in many documented cases, the CEO innocently forwards this regulatory message and the malicious attachment to their own finance officer or IT team, inadvertently widening the attack surface.
Stage 3: Account Takeover and Impersonation:With the CEO's legitimate WhatsApp account now under their control, cybercriminals send highly convincing messages to subordinate staff, particularly those in finance, accounts payable, or treasury functions. These messages carry the full weight of genuine executive authority correct name, profile photo, and account history making them extraordinarily difficult to distinguish from authentic communications.
Stage 4: The Financial Strike:The fraudulent instruction typically requests an urgent, confidential wire transfer to an unfamiliar account, often accompanied by requests for complete secrecy. The employee, believing the instruction to be genuine and fearing the consequences of non-compliance with a directive from their CEO, processes the transaction. By the time the fraud is discovered, the funds have been routed through multiple mule accounts, making recovery extremely difficult.
The Broader Landscape: Scale and Impact
The Boss Scam is not an isolated Indian phenomenon it represents the cutting edge of a global epidemic of executive impersonation fraud. According to the FBI's data, BEC has been the costliest category of cybercrime for several years running, with cumulative global losses that officials have described as exceeding USD 50 billion over the past decade. A 2025 fraud survey found that 90 per cent of U.S. companies experienced attempted cyber-fraud in 2024, with business email compromise and impersonation scams surging by 103 per cent year-on-year. The technological sophistication of these attacks has grown in lockstep with the availability of AI tools. In early 2024, a finance worker at a multinational firm in Hong Kong was tricked into authorising a payment of USD 25 million after attending a video conference in which the CFO and other senior executives were entirely fabricated using deepfake technology. In March 2025, a similar attack unfolded in Singapore, where a finance director authorised nearly USD 499,000 after joining a Zoom call populated entirely by AI-generated deepfakes of company executives. Deepfake attacks against businesses reportedly surged by 3,000 per cent in 2023, and voice cloning fraud rose by 680 per cent the following year. In India, the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau reported over 300 complaints related to the Boss Scam variant alone within a twenty-day period in June 2025. In one prominent case, formerPrime Minister I.K. Gujral's son, Naresh Gujral, reportedly lost approximately Rs 7.8 crorethrough a messaging-app impersonation scheme targeting his company's Chief Financial Officer.
Warning Signs Every Employee Must Recognise
Identifying a Boss Scam attempt requires situational awareness and healthy scepticism. The following red flags should prompt immediate caution:
● Any request for urgent or secret financial transfers received via WhatsApp or email, without prior discussion or formal documentation.
● Instructions to bypass standard approval procedures or to maintain secrecy from colleagues or senior management.
● Compressed files (.zip, .rar) or executable attachments received from any source, including apparently known contacts, claiming to be compliance documents or regulatory updates.
● Messages from executives at unusual hours, particularly those emphasising that a transaction must be completed immediately.
● Claims that a request comes from a government regulator, such as the RBI, delivered through informal channels like WhatsApp.
● Any communication that creates extreme urgency, invokes authority, and simultaneously demands confidentiality the classic triangle of social engineering manipulation. Protective Measures: Defending Against the Boss Scam
For Employees and Finance Teams
The I4C advisory and global cybersecurity authorities recommend several concrete steps that employees can take. The most important is to independently verify any urgent financial instruction through a direct voice call or in-person confirmation before taking action, regardless of how convincing the digital message appears. No financial transaction of significance should be authorised on the basis of a WhatsApp message or email alone.
For Organisations and Leadership
Organisations must implement multi-layered verification protocols for all wire transfers above a defined threshold, making dual authorisation and out-of-band verification mandatory. IT teams should deploy updated malware detection tools, enforce software restriction policies that block unauthorised executable files, and regularly audit devices for signs of compromise. WhatsApp linked devices should be reviewed periodically. Leadership must also commit to regular, mandatory cybersecurity awareness training for all staff, with particular attention to social engineering tactics. The I4C has also emphasised that legitimate regulatory bodies including the RBI , do not distribute software, compliance tools, or security patches via WhatsApp or email attachments. Any such communication must be treated as a potential attack vector and reported immediately.
Conclusion
The Boss Scam exploits organisational trust and human psychology rather than technical vulnerabilities and with deepfake technology now capable of replicating familiar voices and faces, traditional verification instincts are no longer reliable. The strongest defence is a culture of verification without embarrassment, where questioning an unusual instruction is seen as diligence, not insubordination. Awareness, clear protocols, and scepticism towards urgency remain our most powerful tools. If you've encountered such a scam, contact India's National Cybercrime Helpline at 1930 or report at cybercrime.gov.in.
References
- https://www.cybercrime.gov.in
- https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/boss-scam-ceo-impersonation-fraudgovt- advisory-i4c-126062300353_1.html
- https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/boss-scam-all-about-the-new-cyber-fraudtargeting- corporates-and-precautions-listed-by-mha-2026-06-23-1045827
- https://www.freepressjournal.in/business/boss-scam-on-whatsapp-new-ceo-fraudbypasses- traditional-cybersecurity-checks
- https://hyderabadmail.com/tgcsb-warns-boss-scam-ceo-impersonation-fraud-malwarealert/
- https://www.newkerala.com/news/a/rising-boss-scam-threat-targets-senior-executiveswarns- 242.html
- https://www.ic3.gov
- https://www.mcafee.com/learn/is-that-really-your-boss/
- https://abnormal.ai/glossary/ceo-fraud
- https://www.brside.com/blog/deepfake-ceo-fraud-50m-voice-cloning-threat-cfos
- https://www.eftsure.com/blog/cyber-crime/these-7-deepfake-ceo-scams-prove-that-nobusiness- is-safe/
- https://www.knowbe4.com/ceo-fraud
- https://trustpair.com/blog/ceo-fraud-how-to-protect-your-organization-from-fraudsters/
- https://hacked.com/services/executive-impersonation-and-ceo-fraud-protecting-high-networth- individuals/
- https://www.certifid.com/article/ceo-fraud
.webp)
Introduction:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) focuses on threats and is an intelligence-driven agency with both law enforcement and intelligence responsibilities. The FBI has the power and duty to look into certain offences that are entrusted to it and to offer other law enforcement agencies cooperation services including fingerprint identification, lab tests, and training. In order to support its own investigations as well as those of its collaborators and to better comprehend and address the security dangers facing the United States, the FBI also gathers, disseminates, and analyzes intelligence.
The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) Functions combating cybercrime:
- Collection: Internet crime victims can report incidents and notify the relevant authorities of potential illicit Internet behavior using the IC3. Law enforcement frequently advises and directs victims to use www.ic3.gov to submit a complaint.
- Analysis: To find new dangers and trends, the IC3 examines and examines data that users submit via its website.
- Public Awareness: The website posts public service announcements, business alerts, and other publications outlining specific frauds. Helps to raise awareness and make people become aware of Internet crimes and how to stay protected.
- Referrals: The IC3 compiles relevant complaints to create referrals, which are sent to national, international, local, and state law enforcement agencies for possible investigation. If law enforcement conducts an investigation and finds evidence of a crime, the offender may face legal repercussions.
Alarming increase in cyber crime cases:
In the recently released 2022 Internet Crime Report by the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), the statistics paint a concerning picture of cybercrime in the United States. FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) received 39,416 cases of extortion in 2022. The number of cases in 2021 stood at 39,360.
FBI officials emphasize the growing scope and sophistication of cyber-enabled crimes, which come from around the world. They highlight the importance of reporting incidents to IC3 and stress the role of law enforcement and private-sector partnerships.
About Internet Crime Complaint Center IC3:
IC3 was established in May 2000 by the FBI to receive complaints related to internet crimes.
It has received over 7.3 million complaints since its inception, averaging around 651,800 complaints per year over the last five years. IC3's mission is to provide the public with a reliable reporting mechanism for suspected cyber-enabled criminal activity and to collaborate with law enforcement and industry partners.
The FBI encourages the public to regularly review consumer and industry alerts published by IC3. An victim of an internet crime are urged to submit a complaint to IC3, and can also file a complaint on behalf of another person. These statistics underscore the ever-evolving and expanding threat of cybercrime and the importance of vigilance and reporting to combat this growing challenge.
What is sextortion?
The use or threatened use of a sexual image or video of another person without that person’s consent, derived from online encounters or social media websites or applications, primarily to extort money from that person or asking for sexual favours and giving warning to distribute that picture or video to that person’s friends, acquaintances, spouse, partner, or co-workers or in public domain.
Sextortion is an online crime that can be understood as, when an bad actor coerces a young person into creating or sharing a sexual image or video of themselves and then uses it to get something from such young person, such as other sexual images, money, or even sexual favours. Reports highlights that more and more kids are being blackmailed in this way. Sextortion can also happen to adults. Sextortion can also take place by taking your pictures from social media account and converting those pictures into sexually explicit content by morphing such images or creating deepfake by miusing deepfake technologies.
Sextortion in the age of AI and advanced technologies:
AI and deep fake technology make sextortion even more dangerous and pernicious. A perpetrator can now produce a high-quality deep fake that convincingly shows a victim engaged in explicit acts — even if the person has not done any such thing.
Legal Measures available in cases of sextortion:
In India, cybersecurity is governed primarily by the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act). Addressing cyber crimes such as hacking, identity theft, and the publication of obscene material online, sextortion and other cyber crimes. The IT Act covers various aspects of electronic governance and e-commerce, with providing provisions for defining such offences and providing punishment for such offences.
Recently Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 has been enacted by the Indian Government to protect the digital personal data of the Individuals. These laws collectively establish the legal framework for cybersecurity and cybercrime prevention in India. Victims are urged to report the crime to local law enforcement and its cybercrime divisions. Law enforcement will investigate sextortion cases reports and will undertake appropriate legal action.
How to stay protected from evolving cases of sextortion: Best Practices:
- Report the Crime to law enforcement agency and social media platform or Internet service provider.
- Enable Two-step verification as an extra layer of protection.
- Keep your laptop Webcams covered when not in use.
- Stay protected from malware and phishing Attacks.
- Protect your personal information on your social media account, and also monitor your social media accounts in order to identify any suspicious activity. You can also set and review privacy settings of your social media accounts.
Conclusion:
Sextortion cases has been increased in recent time. Knowing the risk, being aware of rules and regulations, and by following best practices will help in preventing such crime and help you to stay safe and also avoid the chance of being victimized. It is important to spreading awareness about such growing cyber crimes and empowering the people to report it and it is also significant to provide support to victims. Let’s all unite in order to fight against such cyber crimes and also to make life a safer place on the internet or digital space.
References:
- https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2022_IC3ElderFraudReport.pdf
- https://octillolaw.com/insights/fbi-ic3-releases-2022-internet-crime-report/
- https://www.iafci.org/app_themes/docs/Federal%20Agency/2022_IC3Report.pdf
