#FactCheck - Viral video attributed to the Australian Prime Minister is AI-generated; claim of cancelling Pakistani visas is false
A video is being shared on social media, falsely attributing it to Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. The video claims that following the Bondi Beach attack, he decided to cancel the visas of Pakistani citizens.
An investigation by the Cyber Peace Foundation revealed that the viral video was created using AI. In the original video, Anthony Albanese was answering questions related to the Climate Change Bill during a press conference. It is important to note that in the attack that took place last Sunday (14 December) at Bondi Beach in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 15 people were killed. According to Australian police, the attack targeted the Jewish community. New South Wales Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon stated that the two accused involved in the attack were father and son—one aged 50 and the other 24. Media reports identified them as Sajid and Naved Akram.
Claim:
On 14 December 2025, a user on the social media platform X shared a video claiming, “After the attack by a Pakistani Islamic terrorist, the Australian Prime Minister has decided to cancel the visas of all Pakistanis. The whole world is troubled by this community, and in India it is said that Abdul cannot buy a house in a Hindu neighbourhood.”
The link to the related post, its archived version, and screenshots can be seen below:

Investigation:Upon closely examining the viral video, we suspected it to be AI-generated. Subsequently, we scanned the video using the AI detection tool aurigin.ai. According to the results provided by the tool, the video was found to be AI-generated.
Related Blogs

Executive Summary:
Several videos claiming to show bizarre, mutated animals with features such as seal's body and cow's head have gone viral on social media. Upon thorough investigation, these claims were debunked and found to be false. No credible source of such creatures was found and closer examination revealed anomalies typical of AI-generated content, such as unnatural leg movements, unnatural head movements and joined shoes of spectators. AI material detectors confirmed the artificial nature of these videos. Further, digital creators were found posting similar fabricated videos. Thus, these viral videos are conclusively identified as AI-generated and not real depictions of mutated animals.

Claims:
Viral videos show sea creatures with the head of a cow and the head of a Tiger.



Fact Check:
On receiving several videos of bizarre mutated animals, we searched for credible sources that have been covered in the news but found none. We then thoroughly watched the video and found certain anomalies that are generally seen in AI manipulated images.



Taking a cue from this, we checked all the videos in the AI video detection tool named TrueMedia, The detection tool found the audio of the video to be AI-generated. We divided the video into keyframes, the detection found the depicting image to be AI-generated.


In the same way, we investigated the second video. We analyzed the video and then divided the video into keyframes and analyzed it with an AI-Detection tool named True Media.

It was found to be suspicious and so we analyzed the frame of the video.

The detection tool found it to be AI-generated, so we are certain with the fact that the video is AI manipulated. We analyzed the final third video and found it to be suspicious by the detection tool.


The detection tool found the frame of the video to be A.I. manipulated from which it is certain that the video is A.I. manipulated. Hence, the claim made in all the 3 videos is misleading and fake.
Conclusion:
The viral videos claiming to show mutated animals with features like seal's body and cow's head are AI-generated and not real. A thorough investigation by the CyberPeace Research Team found multiple anomalies in AI-generated content and AI-content detectors confirmed the manipulation of A.I. fabrication. Therefore, the claims made in these videos are false.
- Claim: Viral videos show sea creatures with the head of a cow, the head of a Tiger, head of a bull.
- Claimed on: YouTube
- Fact Check: Fake & Misleading
.webp)
Introduction
Delhi is Delhi-ing these days — whether it's the protest, the monsoon weather, the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament, metro disruptions, or just the general chaos of it all. Amid everything else, it's been over 30 days, starting from late June 2026, since the large public march organised in part by the group known as the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) converged near Parliament and on Jantar Mantar, and the city hasn't quite exhaled since. Like every large, fast-moving public event, it's come with a parallel flood online: photos, video clips, injury claims, and hot takes pouring in from participants, bystanders, and news outlets alike, all competing for your instagram scroll.
CyberPeace is a non-partisan digital trust and safety organisation, and what we do care about is the online information environment building up around the event — helping people spot misinformation and manipulated media, and encouraging a bit more caution before hitting "share" while rumours are moving faster than facts.
Delhi Police has already made a public appeal along similar lines, asking citizens against online spread of unverified rumours, noting that misinformation could make an already tense situation worse. This advisory builds on that, with some practical guidance for everyday citizens navigating the protest in light of social media.
Why This Matters Right Now
30 plus days in, the story has layers: the original hunger strike, the march itself, police action, viral clips, and now a second wave of commentary reacting to the reactions. Old footage resurfaces relabelled as "live." Numbers get inflated or deflated depending on who's sharing them. Screenshots go around stripped of context. The longer a protest runs, the murkier the timeline gets for anyone just scrolling past — which is exactly when misinformation finds the most room to spread.
The internet access was also restricted in parts of the city during the march, which has itself become a point of attention.
Given how much unverified information is already circulating, it's worth treating any single account of "what actually happened". The full picture will likely take time to emerge through credible reporting and scrutiny.
Why This Moment Is Especially Prone to Misinformation
A few things are working together here to make mis-information spread faster than usual: Emotions are running high. Clashes, injuries, and confrontations naturally provoke strong reactions, and content that makes people angry or afraid tends to get shared quickly, with far less scrutiny than a calm, verified report would get.
There are information gaps. Reports of internet restrictions in parts of the city leave holes that get filled with speculation or worse, old footage recycled and passed off as live updates.
The event is politically charged, which means competing narratives are synthetically being pushed from multiple directions, sometimes deliberately, making it harder to find neutral ground.
There's simply a huge volume of content. Thousands of clips and photos are being posted from one event, which makes it easy for unrelated or out-of-context material to slip in alongside the real thing. And then there's satire. Part of this movement has roots in political satire, so parody posts and meme accounts can easily be mistaken for genuine news if they're shared without context.
Common Types of Misleading Content to Watch For
A few patterns tend to show up again and again during events like this:
- Old footage getting relabelled - Photos or videos from a completely different protest, city, or even country, re-shared with a caption claiming it's from this event.
- Clips taken out of context - A short moment, like a scuffle, shown without what happened right before or after it, changing how it reads.
- Doctored images - Photos edited to add, remove, or exaggerate people, banners, injuries, or crowd size.
- Fake official statements - Screenshots or graphics designed to look like they came from Delhi Police or a government department, but never actually issued.
- Made-up casualty numbers - Figures shared with no real source, often vaguely attributed to "eyewitnesses."
- Impersonation accounts - Handles designed to look like an official police or organiser account, sometimes just one letter off from the real one.
- AI-generated visuals - Fully or partly synthetic images and videos showing scenes or crowds that never actually happened.
- Rumours about shutdowns - Unverified claims about internet blackouts, road closures, or metro shutdowns that may be old, exaggerated, or simply untrue.
What Citizens Should Do:
- Pause before you forward. If a clip or claim makes you feel an instant, strong reaction, that's often the moment to slow down, not speed up.
- Check the timestamp and source. A five-day-old protest generates a lot of recycled footage. Reverse image/video search before assuming something is "breaking."
- Cross-check with more than one outlet. If only one account or page is reporting something dramatic, wait for corroboration.
- Be wary of numbers without sources. Injury counts, crowd sizes, and arrest figures are easy to exaggerate in either direction.
- Don't share unverified visuals of injuries or violence. Beyond accuracy concerns, this can also cause real harm to the people shown.
- When in doubt, don't repost — verify first, or simply sit it out.
How to Check a Claim Before You Share It:
A checklist goes a long way here:
- Pause for a second. Content built to provoke a strong reaction is often designed to get past your defenses before you think twice. Just slowing down is itself protective.
- Ask where it actually came from. Is this from a named journalist or outlet you can verify, or an anonymous forward with no clear origin? Messages that have clearly been passed around many times deserve extra suspicion.
- Look for more than one source. If something significant is genuinely true, you'll usually find several independent, reputable outlets reporting it not just one channel or account.
- Check the date and place. A quick reverse image or video search can tell you if a photo or clip has shown up online before, and what it was originally about.
- Wait for official confirmation. For anything involving police action, injuries, or arrests, check verified accounts like Delhi Police, PIB, established news wires before treating a claim as settled fact.
- Be suspicious of absolute language. Words like "confirmed," "breaking," or "exposed," used without naming any actual source, are a classic misinformation tell.
- Look at the account, not just the post. New accounts with no history, or ones that only ever post about this one topic, deserve a second look.
- Notice when something feels too satisfying. If a claim perfectly confirms what you already believed, that's exactly when you should slow down and check it; it's the content you're least likely to question on your own.
Reliable Fact-Checking Platforms and AI Detection Tools:
These resources can help you check specific claims, images, or videos:
- For fact-checking: PIB Fact Check (factcheck.pib.gov.in) for anything involving government statements or orders; Alt News (altnews.in) and BOOM Live (boomlive.in), two independent Indian outlets that regularly cover protest- and politics-related claims.
- For reverse image and video searches: Google Images, Google Lens, and TinEye can show you where a photo first appeared and in what context. InVID-WeVerify is a free browser plugin built for journalists that breaks videos into keyframes and lets you reverse-search individual frames.
- For AI and synthetic media detection: Hive Moderation and Sensity AI offer public tools for checking images and video. Deepware Scanner focuses specifically on deepfake video. And most major platforms like Meta, YouTube, X are now labeling some AI-generated content automatically, though the absence of a label doesn't mean something's real.
- A few terms worth knowing: A cheapfake is misleading media made with simple editing, cropping, slowing down, re-captioning rather than AI. These are still far more common than actual AI deepfakes. A deepfake is synthetic audio, video, or image content made with AI to convincingly show someone saying or doing something they didn't. Synthetic media is the broader umbrella term for any AI-generated content, whether or not it's being used to deceive.
Reporting Mechanism ~ If You Come Across Suspected Misinformation
Don't share it further, even to mock or correct it any engagement can boost its reach. Check it against the fact-checking tools above before deciding what you think is true. Report it directly on the platform. If it falls under the category of ‘Unlawful Content’ as per IT Rules, you can reach out to the grievance officer of the platform for removal of such content.
If it involves a government statement or order, send it to PIB Fact Check. If it looks like incitement, impersonation, extortion, or another cybercrime, report it to the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in) or call 1930.
Further Steps & helplines
- To file a cybercrime complaint: National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal - 1930 or cybercrime.gov.in
- To flag a fake government-related claim: PIB Fact Check - factcheck.pib.gov.in
- For an on-ground emergency: dial 100 / 112
- CyberPeace Helpline: +91 9570000066 or helpline@cyberpeace.net
- For fact check and debunking of any suspicious viral information, you can reach out to cyberpeace at helpline@cyberpeace.net
- If this advisory feels useful, consider sharing it in family WhatsApp groups, community networks, or student and youth organisations as it helps slow the spread of unverified content when more people are thinking about it.
CyberPeace's Message to Citizens
Being first to share something isn't the same as being right. In moments like this, the most useful thing any of us can do is slow down, verify before sharing, be a little suspicious of content that confirms exactly what we already believed, and trust named, accountable sources over anonymous forwards. Misinformation during civic unrest doesn't just mislead people; it can raise tensions, put individuals at risk, and chip away at trust in both the media and the institutions meant to maintain public order.Our goal is simply to help people navigate the information around it a little more safely and critically.
Conclusion
Protests and public unrest always generate a flood of information, and not all of it will be accurate. What keeps that information environment healthy isn't any single authority or platform, it's the everyday habits of the people deciding, one post at a time, whether to check something or just pass it along. Delhi's news cycle will keep moving, and this advisory isn't asking anyone to disengage from it. It's just a nudge to stay a little more careful with what you believe and what you pass on in this social media age. Pause. Verify. Scroll healthy. Stay CyberPeaceful.
References
- https://rajkaran.in/delhi-police-urges-calm-amid-cjp-protest-warns-against-rumours-as-clashes-erupt-during-chalo-sansad-march
- https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0kkSCYrjRGc
- https://factcheck.pib.gov.in/
- https://www.altnews.in/
- https://www.boomlive.in/
- https://www.vishvasnews.com/
- https://www.factcrescendo.com/
- https://cybercrime.gov.in/
Contributors
- Neeraj Soni, Sr. Research Analyst, Policy & Advocacy, CyberPeace
- Ritika Goswami, Intern - Policy & Advocacy, CyberPeace

Executive Summary:
An old video dated 2023 showing the arrest of a Bangladeshi migrant for murdering a Polish woman has been going viral massively on social media claiming that he is an Indian national. This viral video was fact checked and debunked.
Claim:
The video circulating on social media alleges that an Indian migrant was arrested in Greece for assaulting a young Christian girl. It has been shared with narratives maligning Indian migrants. The post was first shared on Facebook by an account known as “Voices of hope” and has been shared in the report as well.

Facts:
The CyberPeace Research team has utilized Google Image Search to find the original source of the claim. Upon searching we find the original news report published by Greek City Times in June 2023.


The person arrested in the video clip is a Bangladeshi migrant and not of Indian origin. CyberPeace Research Team assessed the available police reports and other verifiable sources to confirm that the arrested person is Bangladeshi.
The video has been dated 2023, relating to a case that occurred in Poland and relates to absolutely nothing about India migrants.
Neither the Polish government nor authorized news agency outlets reported Indian citizens for the controversy in question.

Conclusion:
The viral video falsely implicating an Indian migrant in a Polish woman’s murder is misleading. The accused is a Bangladeshi migrant, and the incident has been misrepresented to spread misinformation. This highlights the importance of verifying such claims to prevent the spread of xenophobia and false narratives.
- Claim: Video shows an Indian immigrant being arrested in Greece for allegedly assaulting a young Christian girl.
- Claimed On: X (Formerly Known As Twitter) and Facebook.
- Fact Check: Misleading.